Search for: "People v. Superior Court"
Results 641 - 660
of 3,243
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Jul 2021, 7:03 am
About two minutes later, the Defendant approached the area where Macaluso was speaking with a group of people. [read post]
20 Jul 2021, 6:55 pm
People v. [read post]
18 Jul 2021, 7:37 am
State v. [read post]
15 Jul 2021, 3:22 am
(§ 32 V-W.) [read post]
13 Jul 2021, 9:17 am
” (R. v. [read post]
11 Jul 2021, 6:16 pm
” Sanders v. [read post]
11 Jul 2021, 6:30 am
Seila Law LLC v. [read post]
9 Jul 2021, 8:22 am
Hill v. [read post]
7 Jul 2021, 12:51 am
(C071785; 39 Cal.App.5th 708; Yolo County Superior Court; CVCV091258.) [read post]
4 Jul 2021, 6:41 am
It was to be a complaint laid before the court of British and world opinion.Its purpose was to persuade those in a position to judge that the actions of American revolutionaries were justified both asa matter of law, that is, as a matter of general principles of political and moral theory. and as a matter of fact, that is, on the application of these principles to the specific acts of mistreatment suffered by the American colonies at the instigation of the government… [read post]
3 Jul 2021, 1:50 am
The Karlsruhe Higher Regional Court decided so in a recent Nokia v. [read post]
2 Jul 2021, 6:58 am
” People v. [read post]
1 Jul 2021, 3:00 am
(C071785; 39 Cal.App.5th 708; Yolo County Superior Court; CVCV091258.) [read post]
30 Jun 2021, 10:28 am
The following is a non-exhaustive list of aggravating factors that will be taken into consideration by the sentencing judge: Whether the defendant has a previous history of sexual assault;Predatory sexual behaviour;Forcible confinement;Strength of violence or force inflicted on the complainant;Repeated acts of violence;Abuse of trust and lasting emotional and/or psychological suffering;Whether a weapon was used;Biological or psychological factors such as a mental illness;Likelihood of… [read post]
30 Jun 2021, 8:48 am
The regional center and the California Department of Developmental Services (DDS), which have the responsibility for providing services for people with developmental disabilities, disagreed with the court’s adjudication and concluded that Medina did not have a developmental disability. [read post]
29 Jun 2021, 3:55 pm
In Hassell v. [read post]
29 Jun 2021, 12:08 pm
In Hudson v. [read post]
28 Jun 2021, 12:35 pm
. . suggest[ed] a superior level of receptive language functions” and that her “measures of nonverbal domains including memory, spatial processing and nonverbal abstract reasoning” were above average. [read post]
28 Jun 2021, 11:59 am
:"The Los Angeles County Superior Court established a conservatorship for 23-year-old K.P. in May 2008 and renewed it annually over the next nine years. [read post]
27 Jun 2021, 8:43 pm
Although the Court in R. v. [read post]
