Search for: "Richardson v. State"
Results 641 - 660
of 1,076
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Nov 2013, 3:53 pm
Nathan Richardson, resident scholar and economist at Resources for the Future, stated: “The most important [GHG] regulations under the [CAA], standards for existing sources, will be similarly unaffected by any outcome of this case. [read post]
18 May 2018, 3:39 am
Richardson, 411 U.S. 677 (1973), was a landmark United States Supreme Court case which decided that benefits given by the United States military to the family of service members cannot be given out differently because of sex.Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg stated at oral argument:"Mr. [read post]
11 Mar 2016, 12:34 pm
Richardson was driving Mr. [read post]
23 Jun 2014, 2:44 am
R (Whiston) v Secretary of State for Justice, heard 26 March 2014. [read post]
6 Jul 2007, 11:21 am
-Marbury v. [read post]
15 May 2024, 10:57 am
Earlier this year, the Fourth Circuit decided United States v. [read post]
3 Aug 2010, 12:00 pm
Richardson-Merrell, Inc., 584 A.2d 1383, 1385 (Pa. 1991). [read post]
7 Jun 2011, 5:01 am
State. [read post]
17 Mar 2021, 9:57 am
Judge Richardson wrote separately in concurrence. [read post]
2 Apr 2019, 6:49 am
One of the cases, Luis Garcia v. [read post]
26 Jul 2015, 9:01 pm
In a 1966 decision, in a Hawaii state legislative redistricting case, Burns v. [read post]
20 Jul 2021, 9:17 am
Under U.S. v. [read post]
29 Oct 2018, 6:12 am
In Richardson v. [read post]
29 Oct 2010, 6:53 am
In Richardson v. [read post]
20 Nov 2007, 4:53 am
In attendance were Judges Clark Richardson, Monica Drinane and Sidney Gribetz. [read post]
8 Aug 2017, 2:45 am
In late July 1974, the Supreme Court ruled unanimously in United States v. [read post]
15 Dec 2020, 11:36 am
See Samson v. [read post]
8 Aug 2013, 12:04 pm
Richardson and Gillis v. [read post]
26 May 2015, 9:14 am
Richardson) that the choice of population measure was a matter for legislatures. [read post]
21 Jul 2014, 10:32 am
For example, as was stated in Generics (UK) Limited and others v H Lundbeck A/S [2009] UKHL 12: “National courts may reach different conclusions as to the evaluation of the evidence in the light of the relevant principles, but the principles themselves should be the same, stemming as they do from the EPC. [read post]
