Search for: "State v. Manis" Results 641 - 660 of 57,228
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Sep 2013, 5:20 am by Timothy P. Flynn
 In the wake of the SCOTUS ruling in June striking down same-sex marriage bans and granting federal benefits to same-sex married couples, many couples are finding their way to court houses across the country.Most states that have what could be called "gay-friendly" legislatures, something that we would expect changes over time, have already passed laws specifically granting gay couples the right to marry in a dozen states. [read post]
19 Jul 2019, 8:16 am by Ingrid Wuerth
A 1781 Pennsylvania state court case against the state of Virginia, Nathan v. [read post]
19 Apr 2016, 10:59 am by Law Offices of Jeffrey S. Glassman
Colvin, March 18, 2016, United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit More Blog Entries: Dimmett v. [read post]
8 Mar 2019, 1:20 pm
  We rely on state law to decide whether to take someone's default (since Rule 4(e)(1) borrows state law). [read post]
4 Nov 2018, 8:09 pm by David Super
       In addition, a third group seeking an Article V convention to reduce federal powers, the Compact for America, released a legal analysisshowing that many of the state resolutions from the 1970s and 1980s, which the Task Force includes in its optimistic count of states, have divergent and often inconsistent language from the BBA Task Force’s newer resolutions. [read post]
20 Nov 2010, 7:58 am by Eugene R. Fidell
As readers who have not already made up their mind ponder what the verdict means for where (if anywhere, as that too is an option to some) the so-called "high value detainees" such as Khalid Sheikh Mohammed should be tried and who bears responsibility for what many view as an unsatisfying outcome despite the 20-years-to-life sentence Mr. [read post]
15 Apr 2014, 9:58 am
Many jurisdictions continue to grapple with the issue, as evidenced in the recent case of Daniel v. [read post]
28 Jan 2016, 9:41 am by Amanda Frost
Many law professors (and lawyers) reject the very concept of state-sovereign immunity. [read post]