Search for: "State v. Rush" Results 641 - 660 of 1,760
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Nov 2010, 4:10 am
”The court noted that, as Titone’s Counsel “adeptly points out that, rather than investigating the fact that rescue equipment was in need of repair, they rushed to punish [Titone] for abiding by his oath to protect and serve the public. [read post]
8 Aug 2008, 12:39 am
" Here's an excerpt: Bad Legal Argument 1: Rushing Into a Judo Flip There's a hidden tax imposed on companies that do business in the United States that hinders their international competitiveness and eventually filters down to consumers. [read post]
There was disagreement on the reasoning, but only two members of the 16-judge en banc panel dissented that the state’s permit process is constitutional, despite the Supreme Court’s significant expansion of gun rights in New York State Rifle & Pistol Association v. [read post]
7 Feb 2013, 3:01 am by Silverberg Zalantis LLP
Since the Town of Chester and the Planning Board of the Town of Blooming Grove, as co-lead agencies of the Mountco project, had already issued a positive declaration, the County was prohibited from issuing a subsequent determination (see 6 NYCRR 617.6[b][3][iii]; Matter of Gordon v Rush, 299 AD2d 20, 29, affd 100 NY2d 236; Matter of Incorporated Vil. of Poquott v Cahill, 11 AD3d 536, 542)." [read post]
24 May 2012, 11:19 am by Marty Schwimmer
Cambridge University Press v Becker (ND. [read post]
31 Oct 2012, 7:16 am by J. Gordon Hylton
Plumer instead voted for his friend, Secretary of State John Quincy Adams for President and United States Ambassador to Britain, William Rush as Vice-President, even though neither Adams nor Rush were candidates for those offices. [read post]
2 Jun 2018, 1:01 am by rhapsodyinbooks
The exclusion of Native people from US citizenship was further established by Elk v. [read post]
25 Nov 2015, 4:56 am by Amy Howe
” In just under two weeks, the Court will hear oral arguments in Evenwel v. [read post]
12 Apr 2009, 10:26 am
With a front-loaded docket, the justices can more easily get opinions out early before the inevitable June rush. [read post]