Search for: "Systems Application & Technologies, Inc. v. United States"
Results 641 - 660
of 772
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Oct 2017, 4:50 pm
2005: SEC v. [read post]
28 Jan 2020, 9:58 pm
Accordingly, Coix filed the Coix Health, LLC v. [read post]
23 May 2018, 8:12 am
United States v. [read post]
26 Oct 2011, 6:26 am
Loving Care Agency, Inc. [read post]
26 Jul 2010, 1:39 am
Bush advanced the rights of a large segment of the citizens of the United States of America. [read post]
15 Mar 2007, 2:12 am
Geographical Distribution of Parties Though the geographical spread of named parties to WIPO UDRP cases (gTLD and ccTLD) reached 137 countries at the end of December 2006, the most frequently named party country both for complainants and for respondents continued to be the United States of America (USA). [read post]
4 Oct 2021, 10:58 am
Similarly, Sulzer Mixpac AG v. [read post]
4 Nov 2013, 9:46 am
Concern expanded to software applications used to infringe copyright. [read post]
5 Dec 2021, 4:39 pm
Surveillance Mishcon de Reya has an article on the risks of facial recognition technology, and how they are best avoided. [read post]
4 Sep 2014, 3:19 am
The list focuses on, among other general requirements, the need to “develop and maintain secure systems and applications,” and the need to “track and monitor all access to network resources and [read post]
8 Jun 2009, 2:00 am
(Excess Copyright) (IPKat) (Ars Technica) (IAM) (Intellectual Property Watch) (Technology Transfer Tactics) (The IP Factor) (Patent Baristas) (ISinIP) (Managing Intellectual Property) GSK, Tafas file petitions for rehearing in Tafas v Doll (Patent Docs) (Patent Docs) (Peter Zura's 271 Patent Blog) (Patently-O) (Inventive Step) (IP Watchdog) Entire Federal Circuit hears argument on whether 271(f) applies to method claims: Cardiac Pacemakers v St Jude Medical (Inventive… [read post]
8 Jun 2009, 2:00 am
(Excess Copyright) (IPKat) (Ars Technica) (IAM) (Intellectual Property Watch) (Technology Transfer Tactics) (The IP Factor) (Patent Baristas) (ISinIP) (Managing Intellectual Property) GSK, Tafas file petitions for rehearing in Tafas v Doll (Patent Docs) (Patent Docs) (Peter Zura's 271 Patent Blog) (Patently-O) (Inventive Step) (IP Watchdog) Entire Federal Circuit hears argument on whether 271(f) applies to method claims: Cardiac Pacemakers v St Jude Medical (Inventive… [read post]
28 Apr 2022, 5:01 am
Then the post discusses the regulation of Apple’s App Store in the United States and China. [read post]
17 Feb 2011, 9:08 pm
“On appeal, the Applicant must persuade the BPAI of reversible error. [read post]
1 Sep 2011, 8:31 am
” Citing its 2010 decision in Research Corporation Technologies, Inc. v. [read post]
1 Sep 2011, 8:31 am
” Citing its 2010 decision in Research Corporation Technologies, Inc. v. [read post]
20 Mar 2024, 8:24 pm
As CISA Director Jen Easterly noted to the New York Times,[15] the most “critical infrastructure” of the United States is our cognitive infrastructure – the framework and tools by which citizens examine and analyze reality. [read post]
29 Mar 2023, 8:28 am
But it was not a claim filed by Oppenheimer, but a claim referred to the CCB from the United States District Court for the Northern District of California. [read post]
9 Dec 2009, 4:40 am
Supreme Court hears arguments on the privacy of personal e-mails on work computers - http://bit.ly/6sVCmiPrivilege in Private E-Mail at Work - http://kuex.us/455eSaving E-Discovery Money with Hit by Term Reports http://bit.ly/6F4AGTSeventh Circuit Adopts Set of Principles and Standing Order for Handling E-Discovery - http://kuex.us/456cThe Cost of Silence in a Social World - http://kuex.us/4909The Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency: Spy v. [read post]
7 Mar 2008, 2:00 am
: (Dilanchian), Review of National Innovation System: (IP Menu News) Bahrain Bahrain gives itself longer to refuse Madrid marks: (I [read post]
