Search for: "United States v. Classic"
Results 641 - 660
of 1,749
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Jun 2011, 9:18 am
Although the text pretty strongly favors Roche, Stanford and the United States (as amicus) presented a strong policy case for public ownership of publicly funded inventions. [read post]
23 Jul 2018, 5:51 am
Barnette].So far, so good: If the state compels an individual to actually say something that betrays her convictions--the classic case being the compulsion of the young Jehovah's Witness students in Barnette to attest their allegiance to the United States, contrary to their genuine beliefs--there's a First Amendment problem. [read post]
9 Oct 2016, 7:26 am
The 2006 revision defined famous trademarks as those that are “widely recognized by the general consuming public of the United States. [read post]
21 Jan 2015, 1:35 pm
Prior to launch of Lecaent in the United Kingdom the First, Second and Third Defendants and each of them shall ensure that each pack of Lecaent supplied to a pharmacist is accompanied by removable notification that is easily legible stating:'This product is not authorised for the treatment of pain and must not be dispensed for such purposes.'5. [read post]
25 Jun 2022, 1:38 pm
It is hosted by Völkerrechtsblog and brilliantly co-organized by Justine Batura (Völkerrechtsblog), Anna Sophia Tiedeke (Völkerrechtsblog) and Michael Riegner (University of Erfurt; co-founder of the Völkerrechtsblog), who will feature as guest editor of the Symposium. [read post]
24 Oct 2013, 12:00 am
Keep an eye on the case of State v. [read post]
8 Jul 2020, 10:22 am
As a measure of the historic rigor accompanying such agreements, prior to the Trump administration, the United States's only safe third country agreement was with Canada, a country whose rule-of-law institutions resemble those of the United States. [read post]
22 Sep 2011, 2:11 pm
United States v. [read post]
1 Jul 2010, 1:05 am
The “argument grounded in jurisprudence” concerns developments in the United States and the Commonwealth (at [66] et seq.). [read post]
28 Oct 2010, 9:14 am
Moreover, the complaint stated that: “[t]he Proposed Transaction . . . represents a classic case of a party standing on both sides of the transaction. [read post]
4 May 2022, 9:01 pm
Gilead does not include the entirety of what used to be the United States, but that aspect of the story is not pertinent to this discussion. [read post]
3 Jul 2011, 3:50 pm
At the end of 2004, there was $17.5 trillion in life insurance policy coverage in the United States. [read post]
29 Jun 2010, 2:51 pm
The classic form of “extraterritoriality,” after all, is effects-based regulation — the application of U.S. law to conduct that occurs in another country on the basis of the harm that results within the United States. [read post]
11 Jul 2012, 8:58 am
The following contribution to our Kiobel v. [read post]
30 Nov 2011, 1:29 am
Directive 2000/31/EC of the European Parliament and Council, implemented in the United Kingdom by the Electronic Commerce (EC Directive) Regulations 2002, requires member states to take steps to ensure the free movement of information society services between member states. [read post]
29 Mar 2012, 4:28 am
United States, 505 U.S. 144 (1992). [read post]
28 Aug 2012, 1:59 pm
(Photo credit: Wikipedia)In U.S. v. [read post]
9 Sep 2016, 10:31 am
After evaluating her claim, the district court ruled in favor of Match.com, citing Title 47, Section 230 of the United States Code, known as the Communications Decency Act (CDA). [read post]
24 Oct 2011, 12:35 pm
Penguin Group (USA) Inc. v. [read post]
24 Oct 2011, 12:31 pm
Penguin Group (USA) Inc. v. [read post]
