Search for: "WARD v. STATE"
Results 641 - 660
of 1,620
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Mar 2016, 2:49 pm
In a classic case of statutory interpretation, in which every technical thrust seemed to be met by an equally adept technical parry, Lockhart v. [read post]
1 Mar 2016, 9:39 am
Supreme Court this morning decided Lockhart v. [read post]
1 Mar 2016, 8:51 am
She says so in today's dissent in Lockhart v. [read post]
29 Feb 2016, 3:19 am
The respondent member nonetheless moved to dismiss the petition, relying on a series of Second and Third Department decisions dismissing for lack of jurisdiction petitions seeking to dissolve foreign business entities, including Matter of Warde-McCann (2d Dept 1987) involving a Delaware corporation, Matter of Porciello (2d Dept 1998) involving a Florida corporation, Matter of MHS Venture Management Corp. (2d Dept 2009) involving a Delaware LLC, and… [read post]
29 Feb 2016, 3:19 am
The respondent member nonetheless moved to dismiss the petition, relying on a series of Second and Third Department decisions dismissing for lack of jurisdiction petitions seeking to dissolve foreign business entities, including Matter of Warde-McCann (2d Dept 1987) involving a Delaware corporation, Matter of Porciello (2d Dept 1998) involving a Florida corporation, Matter of MHS Venture Management Corp. (2d Dept 2009) involving a Delaware LLC, and… [read post]
29 Feb 2016, 3:19 am
The respondent member nonetheless moved to dismiss the petition, relying on a series of Second and Third Department decisions dismissing for lack of jurisdiction petitions seeking to dissolve foreign business entities, including Matter of Warde-McCann (2d Dept 1987) involving a Delaware corporation, Matter of Porciello (2d Dept 1998) involving a Florida corporation, Matter of MHS Venture Management Corp. (2d Dept 2009) involving a Delaware LLC, and… [read post]
13 Feb 2016, 4:46 pm
Ecotone Farm, LLC v Ward, 2016 WL 335837 (3rd Cir CA 1/28/16)Filed under: Current Caselaw, Due Process, Equal Protection, Immunity, Uncategorized [read post]
13 Feb 2016, 6:07 am
Feb. 1, 2016, By Garrett Brnger, KSAT ABC-12 More Blog Entries: Cleveland v. [read post]
12 Feb 2016, 10:00 am
The Appellate Division sustained the Commissioner’s decision.The court said that substantial evidence supports the findings of misconduct, rejecting Rigaud’s contentions that his conduct and loss of temper were justified responses to allegedly discriminatory conduct by coworkers and superiors and retaliation for discrimination complaints which he filed, noting that the hearing officer credited the agency's witnesses' testimony, including their testimony that their conduct was… [read post]
12 Feb 2016, 8:00 am
Brewing, Inc. v. [read post]
9 Feb 2016, 7:30 am
In Creative Ventures, LLC v. [read post]
31 Jan 2016, 9:30 pm
Bank v. [read post]
28 Jan 2016, 7:12 am
The case is Ward Sand and Materials Co. v. [read post]
27 Jan 2016, 3:55 am
Plaintiff in McFadden v. [read post]
Appellate Court Affirms Exclusion of Plaintiff’s Medical Expert Testimony Based on Lack of Certainty
26 Jan 2016, 9:31 am
Cleveland v. [read post]
24 Jan 2016, 4:00 am
… Tenny v. [read post]
22 Jan 2016, 9:42 am
United States, 529 U.S. 848, 857 (2000) (quoting United States ex rel. [read post]
20 Jan 2016, 8:18 am
In United States v. [read post]
18 Jan 2016, 9:01 pm
M.C. v. [read post]
