Search for: "Cost v. Cost" Results 6581 - 6600 of 48,975
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Jun 2021, 4:08 am by Jon L. Gelman
§ 424a(d) explicitly states that a triennial redetermination is not applicable in reverse offset states.Because the NJ Legislature did not include a cost-of-living increase in the statute, and the federal statute exempts reverse offset states from reviewing its benefits triennially, we affirm the order denying a redetermination of benefits and for the reimbursement of overpayment of benefits.Wilhelm v. [read post]
21 Jun 2021, 6:36 am by Jay R. McDaniel, Esq.
Dominic Thomas Karipaparambil, Plaintiff-Appellant, v Robert Michael Polus et al., Defendants-Respondents. [read post]
18 Jun 2021, 10:21 am by NCC Staff
The Next Major Challenge to the Affordable Care Act By Nicholas Bagley, Professor of Law, University of Michigan Law School Nicholas Bagley discusses Kelley v. [read post]
18 Jun 2021, 7:44 am by John Jascob
Despite the fact that shareholder proposals are an important engine of corporate democracy, the SEC failed to meet its legal obligation to provide an economic analysis of the proposed rule’s costs and benefits, while offering purported justifications for the amendments that were "flawed at every turn," the plaintiffs contend (Interfaith Center on Corporate Responsibility v. [read post]
18 Jun 2021, 6:10 am by John-Paul Boyd, QC
Take the appellate case law on costs. [read post]
18 Jun 2021, 2:58 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
Please see the UKSC Blog New Judgment post for Manchester Building Society v Grant Thornton UK LLP here. [read post]
17 Jun 2021, 2:02 pm
., and high housing costs and tax rates (inter alia) for the latter.But what I really felt strongly when I read today's opinion -- which is by no means an exceptional or unusual one, I might add -- was just how much I like living in a state that has a supreme court like ours. [read post]