Search for: "D&S, Inc." Results 6581 - 6600 of 26,061
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Sep 2018, 2:48 am
[Section 2(d) refusal of ZEKE for clothing and athletic apparel in view of two registered marks: ZEKE'S SMOKEHOUSE for "hats, caps, blouses, sweat shirts," and ZEKE'S COFFEE in standard and design form [COFFEE DISCLAIMED) for athletic apparel]. [read post]
27 Sep 2018, 1:42 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
Environmental Chemicals, Inc., 509 F.Supp. 36 (S.D.N.Y. 1980)Found this in an unrelated search and it made me think about the utility (if any) of the nominative fair use category. [read post]
27 Sep 2018, 12:47 pm by Brittany O'Neill
S-2839 would authorize an appropriation of $250,000 for the New Jersey Manufacturing Extension Program, Inc. [read post]
27 Sep 2018, 5:04 am by John Lewis
Uber Technologies, Inc., a Ninth Circuit panel, in four related appeals from District Judge Edward Chen’s rulings, reversed the denial of Uber Technologies Inc. [read post]
26 Sep 2018, 9:05 pm by Dan Flynn
“However, it was not until Aug. 30, 2018, that the first recall related to this outbreak was initiated by Publix Super Markets Inc. [read post]
§1332(d)(2)(A), (d)(5)(B); See Serrano v. 180 Connect, Inc., 478 F. 3d 1018, 1024 (9th Cir. 2007).[4] The local controversy exception is set forth in 28 U.S.C. [read post]
26 Sep 2018, 8:18 am by Erik Slobe
The US Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit [official website] ruled [opinion] Tuesday that Uber Technologies Inc. [read post]
26 Sep 2018, 6:23 am by Editor Charlie
  I’d say let’s check back in 6 months and see how things are going. [read post]
26 Sep 2018, 6:08 am by Tammy Binford
What’s Next On August 1, the Board issued a notice inviting briefs on whether it should “adhere to, modify, or overrule Purple Communications, Inc. [read post]
26 Sep 2018, 6:08 am by Tammy Binford
What’s Next On August 1, the Board issued a notice inviting briefs on whether it should “adhere to, modify, or overrule Purple Communications, Inc. [read post]
26 Sep 2018, 4:00 am by Administrator
Rogers Communications Inc. v. [read post]