Search for: "Defendants A-F" Results 6581 - 6600 of 29,830
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Nov 2007, 6:00 am
In the CLRA context, "[f]raud or deceit may consist of the suppression of a fact by one who is bound to disclose it or who gives information of other facts which are likely to mislead for want of communication of that fact. [read post]
5 Nov 2009, 9:09 pm
Bradwell, 388 F.2d 619, 622 (2d Cir.1968) (discussing the undue prejudice that can result when the “minute peg of relevancy [is] entirely obscured by the dirty linen hung upon it” (citation omitted)).Lawyers (Farmer): Jeremy Epstein, Seth Kean, Grace Lee, Rebecca Boon (Shearman & Sterling LLP) (defendant); AUSAs Ilene Jaroslaw, Peter NorlingLawyers (Williams): Donald Yanella (defendant); AUSAs Justin Lerer, Jo Ann Navickas [read post]
20 Feb 2011, 5:55 am
The defendant was pacing in the middle of the street and scratching his face. [read post]
21 Nov 2018, 2:23 pm by Orin Kerr
They appoint lawyers under the CJA, appoint federal defenders, review voucher requests, approve experts, and the like. [read post]
23 Jul 2018, 4:53 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
[FN1]Defendant responds that he has provided full disclosure but, in any event, is willing to supplement that disclosure (Def Aff ¶¶ 11-12, citing Def Exh F). [read post]
City of Chicago, —F.4th—, 2022 WL 1548176 (May 17, 2022), the Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals recently struck down one litigant’s attempt to employ a “stealth” class action. [read post]
22 Aug 2008, 1:00 pm
., ___ F.3d ___ (Aug. 19, 2008), the Third Circuit held that the FDA's "regulatory actions" did not preempt certain non-disclosure claims brought under New Jersey law. [read post]
29 May 2012, 4:57 pm by Steven G. Pearl
KPIX-TV (9th Cir. 5/29/12) --- F.3d ---, the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeal addresses the use of statistical evidence in disparate treatment age discrimination cases. [read post]
2 Jan 2014, 8:00 am by Charon QC
A Guide to Appearing at Court for a Driving Offence f you’ve never been to court before, you’re unlikely to know what to expect. [read post]
26 May 2015, 10:14 am by John Stigi
§ 78bb(f), to preclude state law claims that fall within the anti-falsity provisions of the Securities Act of 1933 and Securities Exchange Act of 1934, (1) the claims must allege that the defendant, not some third party, engaged in the requisite false conduct and (2) the allegation of false conduct must be necessary to liability under the state laws alleged. [read post]