Search for: "Defendants A-F" Results 6581 - 6600 of 29,830
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Oct 2018, 6:51 am by David Markus
Barrett, __ F.3d ___, 2018 WL 4288566 (2d Cir. [read post]
5 Oct 2018, 2:00 am by Jane Meacham, Contributing Editor
Source: Pgiam / iStock / Getty In Notice 2018-74, the agency refreshed guidance on the safe harbor that employers may use to comply with retirement plan participant notice requirements in advance of rollover distributions under Section 402(f) of the federal tax code. [read post]
5 Oct 2018, 2:00 am by Jane Meacham, Contributing Editor
Source: Pgiam / iStock / Getty In Notice 2018-74, the agency refreshed guidance on the safe harbor that employers may use to comply with retirement plan participant notice requirements in advance of rollover distributions under Section 402(f) of the federal tax code. [read post]
3 Oct 2018, 3:23 pm by Limore Torbati
City of San Mateo, 229 F.3d 917 (2000): The Legislature prohibits reliance on this opinion to determine what conduct is sufficiently severe or pervasive to constitute actionable harassment under the FEHA. [read post]
3 Oct 2018, 2:00 pm by Dennis Crouch
The district court sided with the defendant on summary judgment — holding that the NDA authorized use of the confidential information for patent filings. [read post]
3 Oct 2018, 11:26 am by John Elwood
§ 2255(f)(3); and (2) whether the residual clause of the pre-Booker career offender guideline is unconstitutionally vague. [read post]
3 Oct 2018, 9:41 am by Eric Goldman
For example, in theory, a website could be liable for third party content under a legal doctrine that doesn’t purport to treat the defendant as the ICP–even if the claim is otherwise based on third party content. [read post]
3 Oct 2018, 9:08 am
Chandler, 326 F.3d 210, 219 (3d Cir. 2003), which asks: (1) whether the limitation “significantly inhibited [the defendant’s] effective exercise of her right to inquire into [the] witness’s ‘motivation in testifying’” and (2) if so, whether the limitation fell within “those ‘reasonable limits’ which a trial court, in due exercise of its discretion, has authority to establish. [read post]
2 Oct 2018, 7:01 pm by Shea Denning
United States, 328 F.2d 739, 743 (10th Cir. 1964) (so holding); State v. [read post]
2 Oct 2018, 7:30 am by Public Employment Law Press
Failure to Prosecute - The Circuit Court explained that a district court may dismiss an action "[i]f the plaintiff fails to prosecute or to comply with [the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure] or a court order" and reviews Rule 41(b) dismissals for abuse of discretion. [read post]