Search for: "Doe v. Superior Court"
Results 6581 - 6600
of 8,636
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Mar 2016, 3:28 am
While “[t]he Limited Liability Company Law does not expressly authorize a buyout in a dissolution proceeding'” (Mizrahi v Cohen, 104 AD3d 917, 920, quoting Matter of Superior Vending, LLC [Tal-Plotkin], 71 AD3d 1153, 1154), “in certain circumstances, a buyout may be an appropriate equitable remedy upon the dissolution of an LLC” (Mizrahi v Cohen, 104 AD3d at 920 [emphasis added]). [read post]
28 Mar 2016, 3:28 am
While “[t]he Limited Liability Company Law does not expressly authorize a buyout in a dissolution proceeding'” (Mizrahi v Cohen, 104 AD3d 917, 920, quoting Matter of Superior Vending, LLC [Tal-Plotkin], 71 AD3d 1153, 1154), “in certain circumstances, a buyout may be an appropriate equitable remedy upon the dissolution of an LLC” (Mizrahi v Cohen, 104 AD3d at 920 [emphasis added]). [read post]
28 Mar 2016, 3:28 am
While “[t]he Limited Liability Company Law does not expressly authorize a buyout in a dissolution proceeding'” (Mizrahi v Cohen, 104 AD3d 917, 920, quoting Matter of Superior Vending, LLC [Tal-Plotkin], 71 AD3d 1153, 1154), “in certain circumstances, a buyout may be an appropriate equitable remedy upon the dissolution of an LLC” (Mizrahi v Cohen, 104 AD3d at 920 [emphasis added]). [read post]
8 Mar 2010, 3:25 am
Superior Court, 480 U.S. 102, 112(1987); but cf. [read post]
22 Sep 2009, 11:38 am
” In Standard Pacific Corp. v. [read post]
31 Aug 2015, 8:50 am
Replacements (Forbes Cross-Post) Telephone Consumer Protection Act Case Update – Summer 2013 Edition Telephone Consumer Protection Act Case Update – February 2013 Edition California Supreme Court: Retail Privacy Statute Doesn’t Apply to Download Transactions – Apple v Superior Court (Krescent) Court: Customer Consents to Receive Texts by Providing Phone Number to Pharmacy – Pinkard v. [read post]
27 Nov 2012, 3:33 am
Smith, who’s convinced that his trial skills are superior to that of his attorney. [read post]
28 Jun 2021, 9:45 am
But if a state wants to ban viewpoint discrimination by platforms, § 230(c)(2) does not preempt that choice. [read post]
23 Aug 2024, 12:16 pm
Finally, the widely cited 2001 U.S. v. [read post]
2 May 2010, 1:12 pm
Bell v. [read post]
15 Sep 2011, 7:29 am
” The Court’s decision last Term in AT&T Mobility, LLC v. [read post]
15 May 2023, 10:58 am
Superior Ct. [read post]
21 Mar 2008, 1:48 pm
" Pursuant to the California Supreme Court's opinion in Hubbart v. [read post]
11 Jun 2019, 4:00 am
In Zerr v. [read post]
21 Sep 2019, 4:03 pm
Katz in a widely read blog entitled Access Copyright v. [read post]
15 Jan 2013, 4:49 am
The facts in the U.S. 9th Circuit Court of Appeals ruling in Lawler v. [read post]
14 Jul 2008, 6:35 am
Judge Bellantoni then turned to the four-step test set forth by the Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division, in Dendrite International v. [read post]
3 Apr 2017, 10:50 am
Plati, the Ontario Superior Court of Justice found that that is exactly what the contract said. [read post]
2 Aug 2023, 9:01 pm
EPA and Biden v. [read post]
28 Apr 2020, 8:26 am
Superior Court, 132 Cal.App.4th 826, 833-35)). [read post]
