Search for: "Does, 1-20"
Results 6581 - 6600
of 27,661
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Aug 2024, 8:54 am
The RIDTPPA takes effect on January 1, 2026. [read post]
6 Oct 2021, 4:10 am
Back in September, AG Rantos presented his Opinion in the case TOTO, C-581/20. [read post]
15 Mar 2018, 6:13 am
Cathryn Houston, trainee solicitor at CMS, considers the case of Navigators Insurance Company Limited and others v Atlasnavios-Navegacao LDA (formerly Bnavios-Navegacao LDA), which is due to be heard by the UK Supreme Court on Tuesday 20 March 2018: On 20 March 2018, the UK Supreme Court (sitting in a panel comprising Lord Mance, Lord Sumption, Lord Carnwath, Lord Hughes, Lord Briggs) will hear this appeal relating to the interpretation and interplay between clauses of the standard… [read post]
14 Feb 2007, 10:21 pm
Without this amendment item 20 captures accounts with non-financial institutions which were not intended to be covered by the AML/CTF Act. [read post]
20 Sep 2018, 8:05 am
The dual jobs regulation, like the FLSA, does not offer a precise definition for “occupation. [read post]
4 Jun 2021, 12:18 pm
Forrest 20-1648Issues: (1) Whether the name of the author of a copyrighted work is copyright management information or whether it must also be apparent from context that the name is copyright-related; and (2) whether the name of the copyright owner of a copyrighted work is copyright management information or whether it must also be apparent from context that the name is copyright-related. [read post]
15 Dec 2016, 10:01 am
If there were no consecutive sentence rule at all, the aggregate sentence could be 140 days (60 + 20 + 20 + 20 + 20). [read post]
21 Sep 2011, 1:09 pm
But does it make sense in the real world? [read post]
15 Dec 2016, 10:01 am
If there were no consecutive sentence rule at all, the aggregate sentence could be 140 days (60 + 20 + 20 + 20 + 20). [read post]
16 Jun 2014, 11:59 am
See also §1611(a), (b)(1), (b)(2). [read post]
7 May 2015, 3:07 am
§ 29-20-205(1). [read post]
16 Oct 2016, 12:12 pm
But, the USDA’s Program does not apply to non-agricultural products. [read post]
25 Mar 2009, 8:00 am
The court rejected this argument stating that the Section 20(a) does not require control of a particular violating transaction, but only control of a person or entity liable under the chapter. [read post]
2 Feb 2011, 6:23 pm
General Statutes § 20-351 et seq. [read post]
19 Nov 2011, 11:01 am
Use of such a coating to form an insulating layer between a metal tubular body and a sheath is not described.[4.4.4] E9 describes the application of a coating (20) by plasma deposition to the surface of a glow plug (see last paragraph on page 5). [read post]
24 Mar 2021, 3:30 am
The DOL may also reinstate the 80/20 rule, among other things. [read post]
17 Jan 2014, 5:15 am
The UMA does not provide as much guidance as does its provisions for privilege. [read post]
2 Feb 2011, 6:23 pm
General Statutes § 20-351 et seq. [read post]
2 Feb 2011, 6:23 pm
General Statutes § 20-351 et seq. [read post]
13 Aug 2015, 3:03 am
” Because father was not the primary residential parent, he was not the legal custodian for purposes of § 20-1-105(b). [read post]
