Search for: "Plaintiff(s)"
Results 6581 - 6600
of 178,471
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Feb 2015, 2:36 pm
With respect to plaintiff's 90/180 claim, defendants rely on the testimony of the plaintiff which indicates there was virtually no diminution in the plaintiff's ability to work. [read post]
27 Feb 2019, 5:00 am
.), the court granted the carrier’s 12(b)(6) Motion to Dismiss the Plaintiff’s Bad Faith Claim but granted the Plaintiff leave to file an Amended Complaint. [read post]
9 Oct 2014, 7:36 am
§ 285 after the court dismissed plaintiff's infringement action for failing to obtain new counsel and rejected defendant's argument regarding plaintiff's litigation practices. [read post]
10 Dec 2006, 1:48 pm
The Plaintiff continued with their sixth day of opening statements as the week ended. [read post]
29 Nov 2012, 1:51 pm
As such, Levitz's motion to dismiss plaintiff’s claims as against it is denied as moot. [read post]
29 Nov 2012, 1:51 pm
As such, Levitz's motion to dismiss plaintiff’s claims as against it is denied as moot. [read post]
22 Apr 2020, 5:21 pm
Plaintiffs in these cases must meet two main criteria to establish that their activity was within the “course and scope of employment”, the activity must: Continue reading → [read post]
5 Jan 2009, 8:01 pm
Here’s my argument as to why a plaintiff should be allowed to commence an action at the same time it files a PJR. [read post]
10 Oct 2023, 11:25 am
Plaintiff alleged, for example, that in McDonald’s advertisements, “the beef patty extend[s] all the way to the edge of the bun,” but the patty “comes nowhere near the edge of the bun” when a hamburger is actually served. [read post]
9 Jul 2023, 2:20 pm
.) -- denying government’s motion for reconsideration of court’s rulings that: (1) plaintiff qualified as an educational institution because he demonstrated that his requests were connected to his scholarly research ; and (2) plaintiff’s potential profit from publishing responsive records on his webpage did not trump plaintiff’s intentions to use records for scholarly purposes, and therefore government improperly… [read post]
22 Aug 2019, 10:35 am
In a Maryland personal injury case, the jury typically determines not only whether the defendant should be liable for the plaintiff’s injuries, but also the amount of damages that the plaintiff is entitled to. [read post]
26 Jan 2009, 7:22 am
Lindor's legal defense in UMG v. [read post]
5 May 2014, 5:10 am
The trial against another defendant then proceeded without Par's presence, and Dr. [read post]
6 Jan 2014, 7:26 am
This case was before the court on plaintiff’s motion for conditional certification. [read post]
10 Oct 2010, 7:54 pm
Phillips & Cohen LLP, the nation’s most successful law firm representing whistleblowers, has been selected for the National Law Journal’s “Hot List” of the Top 12 plaintiffs’ law firms in the U.S. for 2010.It is the fourth time in seven years that Phillips & Cohen has been named to the National Law Journal’s highly selective “Hot List” for its work on whistleblower cases.Phillips & Cohen was the only law… [read post]
27 Aug 2020, 4:00 am
Moreover, Plaintiff fails to present sufficient evidence to establish that each of the of the Individual Defendants, in voting to deny Plaintiff’s variance application, acted with discriminatory intent or religious annimus...However, in finding that the Individual Defendants are entitled to qualified immunity, the Court cautions that its decision here should in no way be construed as a finding that Plaintiff’s constitutional rights were… [read post]
14 Mar 2023, 4:00 am
" It rejected plaintiff's free speech and freedom of assembly claims, relying on the Supreme Court's 1905 decision in Jacobson v. [read post]
17 Jan 2017, 8:51 am
Jimenez, the court ultimately determined that the plaintiff’s award should not be reduced due to the right of subrogation, which may result in the insurance company seeking payment from the plaintiff for previously paid benefits. [read post]
17 Jan 2017, 8:51 am
Jimenez, the court ultimately determined that the plaintiff’s award should not be reduced due to the right of subrogation, which may result in the insurance company seeking payment from the plaintiff for previously paid benefits. [read post]
5 Jun 2014, 3:35 am
And that’s why it’s so surprising to read a recent article for the DePaul Law Review from law professors Morris A. [read post]
