Search for: "State v. First Judicial District Court"
Results 6581 - 6600
of 9,091
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 May 2012, 2:14 pm
District Court for the Southern District of New York by President George H.W. [read post]
24 May 2012, 9:43 am
Chicago, 561 U.S. 3025 (2010), the first case applying the Second Amendment to the states through the Fourteenth Amendment. [read post]
24 May 2012, 8:58 am
Thus there has been actual state judicial practice establishing “attempts” as part of piracy; the Court didn’t just read this off a treaty that had never been applied in any case. [read post]
23 May 2012, 4:31 pm
On May 23, 2012, the California Supreme Court by unanimous vote granted respondents’ and real parties’ petition for review of the First District Court of Appeal’s published decision in Berkeley Hillside Preservation, et al. v. [read post]
23 May 2012, 1:27 pm
In Illinois, where the state supreme court ruled in Valley Forge Ins. [read post]
23 May 2012, 1:27 pm
In Illinois, where the state supreme court ruled in Valley Forge Ins. [read post]
23 May 2012, 12:14 pm
Twenty-two states along with the District of Columbia line up behind this argument. [read post]
23 May 2012, 11:45 am
In reality, what we have are poorly informed musings of a young district court judge grappling with one of his first patent cases. [read post]
23 May 2012, 9:56 am
The United States Court of Appeals for the D.C. [read post]
23 May 2012, 8:40 am
Faber, United States v. [read post]
23 May 2012, 5:49 am
in a district court of the United States . . . in a judicial district . . . through which the defendant carrier operates”, or, when suing the carrier alleged to have caused the damage, “in the judicial district in which such loss or damage is alleged to have occurred”. [read post]
22 May 2012, 5:14 pm
The district court granted a motion to dismiss, and the plaintiffs appealed. [read post]
22 May 2012, 7:13 am
In light of the Supreme Court’s grant of certiorari yesterday to review the Second Circuit’s decision in Clapper v. [read post]
21 May 2012, 8:18 am
The Fifth District held that in light of their recent decision in State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company v. [read post]
21 May 2012, 3:44 am
In the courts of appeals… In State v. [read post]
18 May 2012, 6:57 pm
Co., 328 F.3d 462 (8th Cir.2003) (affirming the district court's selection of an arbitrator pursuant to section 5); ACEquip Ltd. v. [read post]
18 May 2012, 6:57 pm
Co., 328 F.3d 462 (8th Cir.2003) (affirming the district court's selection of an arbitrator pursuant to section 5); ACEquip Ltd. v. [read post]
18 May 2012, 10:14 am
SOURCE: TEXAS SUPREME COURT - Honorable Hope Andrade v. [read post]
18 May 2012, 8:02 am
After thoroughly scrutinizing the record and given that overt racial discrimination persists in covered jurisdictions notwithstanding decades of section 5 preclearance, we, like the district court, are satisfied that Congress’s judgment deserves judicial deference. [read post]
17 May 2012, 12:09 pm
First, the Commission argued that Judge Rakoff erred requiring that the proposed consent judgment be supported by admitted or judicially established facts – such a ruling was contrary to established law. [read post]
