Search for: "The United States, Petitioner" Results 6581 - 6600 of 8,963
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Jun 2011, 11:41 am by Kiera Flynn
United States came from Orin Kerr – who argued the case on behalf of the petitioner. [read post]
16 Jun 2011, 9:35 pm
It has been our experience that petitioner's often transfer their investment capital to the United States by employing the assistance of third-party intermediaries. [read post]
16 Jun 2011, 8:45 pm by Jon L. Gelman
Generally, a party “is ‘[o]ne by or against whom a lawsuit is brought,’ ” United States ex rel. [read post]
16 Jun 2011, 8:07 pm by Michael M. O'Hear
United States (No. 09-1227), the Supreme Court ruled that the defendant should have been permitted to raise a Tenth-Amendment challenge to the chemical-weapons statute that she was convicted of violating. [read post]
16 Jun 2011, 2:59 pm by Abbott & Kindermann
 The petitioners presented eight causes of action, all linked to alleged compliance with various requirements of state affordable housing requirements applicable to planning, zoning and land development laws. [read post]
16 Jun 2011, 10:50 am by Michael O'Hear
United States (No. 09-1227), the Court ruled that a defendant may raise a Tenth-Amendment challenge to the statute under which she was convicted. [read post]
16 Jun 2011, 9:54 am by Russell Jackson
Justice Kagan's opinion rejects this approach, holding that the injunctive relief was prevented by the Anti-Injunction Act, which provides that "[a] court of the United States may not grant an injunction to stay proceedings in a State court except . . . to protect or effectuate its judgments. [read post]
16 Jun 2011, 4:58 am by Brandon W. Barnett
United States, 486 U.S. 153 (1988), the CCA explained that trial courts “must recognize a presumption in favor of a defendant’s counsel of choice. [read post]
15 Jun 2011, 12:43 pm by Lisa McElroy
Finally, the Court also issued its opinion in United States v. [read post]
14 Jun 2011, 6:36 pm by Raffaela Wakeman
Under the AUMF the government was required to prove both that Suleiman was a member of the Taliban and that he engaged in, or purposefully and materially supported, hostilities against the United States or its coalition partners; the government did not meet this burden. [read post]
14 Jun 2011, 4:16 pm by Kiera Flynn
Hyatt Docket: 10-1219 Issue(s):  Whether a plaintiff, who is appealing the denial of an application of a patent by commencing a civil action against the Director of the United States Patent and Trademark Office (PTO) in a federal district court pursuant to 35 U.S.C. [read post]
14 Jun 2011, 2:15 pm by Eugene Volokh
” For more on that, see here (and see also this religious exemption map of the United States). [read post]