Search for: "UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. "
Results 6581 - 6600
of 8,929
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Aug 2011, 8:36 am
Recent developments in Texas, United States, and international energy law. 6 Tex. [read post]
8 Aug 2011, 8:04 am
Holder, and HHS v. [read post]
8 Aug 2011, 4:25 am
The patent is assigned to The United States of America, represented by the Secretary of Commerce. [read post]
6 Aug 2011, 2:27 pm
Co. v. [read post]
5 Aug 2011, 8:23 pm
However, our Circuit has interpreted Robertson v. [read post]
5 Aug 2011, 3:03 pm
Unbeknownst to many Kentucky attorneys, United States District Court Judge John G. [read post]
5 Aug 2011, 3:03 pm
Unbeknownst to many Kentucky attorneys, United States District Court Judge John G. [read post]
4 Aug 2011, 11:53 am
Some people decry the "softening" of the United States. [read post]
3 Aug 2011, 8:21 am
In United States v. [read post]
3 Aug 2011, 5:43 am
Joseph Abbey v. [read post]
2 Aug 2011, 11:57 pm
" Case Name: Oracle America, Inc. v. [read post]
2 Aug 2011, 11:57 pm
" Case Name: Oracle America, Inc. v. [read post]
2 Aug 2011, 2:01 pm
” Balkin says the two positions are ultimately symbiotic, since “dissensus about constitutional values—–the most characteristic feature of constituional Protestantism—is the great engine of constitutional change, shaping even that most ‘catholic’ of institutions, the United States Supreme Court” (97). [read post]
2 Aug 2011, 8:19 am
EFFECTIVE DATE.AN ACTTo provide the Consumer Product Safety Commission with greater authority and discretion in enforcing the consumer product safety laws, and for other purposes.Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,SECTION 1. [read post]
1 Aug 2011, 5:37 pm
Ct.)Petition for certiorariBrief in oppositionAmicus brief of the Council on State Taxation et al.Amicus brief of Market America, Inc.Amicus brief of The Tax Foundation (forthcoming)Petitioner's reply Title: KFC Corp. v. [read post]
1 Aug 2011, 4:49 pm
This law provides an exception to the general rule that the person who creates a work is the legal author of that work; according to copyright law in the United States, a work “made for hire” is legally owned by the employer, and not the employee. [read post]
1 Aug 2011, 1:49 pm
to be enforced within the United States. [read post]
1 Aug 2011, 6:22 am
Reed, and Lawrence v. [read post]
1 Aug 2011, 5:41 am
This essay explores the possible dual readings of AT&T v. [read post]
