Search for: "United States v. Peoples" Results 6581 - 6600 of 22,868
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Sep 2022, 4:00 am by Eric Segall
Both casesare brought by a non-profit organization long committed to ending all affirmative action in the United States. [read post]
14 Jul 2014, 6:22 am by Patrick Maines
But several years before Citizens United, the Court largely nullified a major section of its McCain-Feingold decision when it ruled, in FEC v. [read post]
1 May 2012, 1:01 pm by Lyle Denniston
Besides the amicus brief filed by Citizens United, another such brief — urging the Court to accept the case for regular review at its next Term — was filed last week by Free Speech for People and other advocacy organizations, arguing that the facts on which the Court based its 2010 ruling in Citizens United v. [read post]
7 Feb 2023, 2:57 pm by Eugene Volokh
He remains wanted by the United States criminal justice system. [read post]
28 Jun 2014, 6:00 am
Herbalife issued the following statement: Today's decision by the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit in the FTC v. [read post]
7 Aug 2013, 7:06 pm by Rahul Bhagnari, ACLU
Byron has lived in the United States for nearly three decades and started several successful small businesses. [read post]
21 Jan 2014, 5:00 am by Guest Blogger
Hobby Lobby, Inc., the United States adopts a similar cost-shifting argument as part of its compelling interest analysis under RFRA. [read post]
14 Aug 2014, 3:32 pm by Frank Pasquale
As she argues, in Little Rock in the 1950s, the "image of American democracy was at stake:" "foreign critics questioned how the United States could argue that its democratic system of government was a model for others to follow when racial segregation was tolerated in the nation. [read post]
20 Oct 2016, 1:57 pm by Gritsforbreakfast
Supp. 3d 239, 246 (E.D.N.Y. 2015) (finding error rates between 0.9 and 1.5% to favor admission of expert testimony); United States v. [read post]
22 Jun 2017, 4:00 am by The Public Employment Law Press
"The United States Supreme Court has applied a two-part test to determine whether there was a right of access under the First Amendment [see Press-Enterprise Co. v Superior Ct. of Cal., County of Riverside, 478 US 1, 8-10], and the [New York State] Court of Appeals has used that test to determine whether there is a right of access to a professional disciplinary hearing;4. [read post]
7 Aug 2020, 6:16 am by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
The district court dismissed the case, but the Court of Appeals revives the case.The case is New Hope Family Services v. [read post]