Search for: "Voter v. Voter"
Results 6581 - 6600
of 6,772
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 May 2024, 12:30 pm
[Eagle-eyed readers might notice that the court cites Saunders v. [read post]
4 Oct 2020, 9:29 am
Supreme Court on Monday, Carney v. [read post]
22 Dec 2009, 5:26 am
That’s also how that canceled check ended as a primary exhibit in the case of State of Texas v. [read post]
14 Mar 2010, 7:16 pm
Just as it is not very meaningful for a voter to vote "non-Reagan,"' it is not very helpful to tell a judge to be a "non-originalist. [read post]
12 Jun 2020, 2:31 pm
Then it's less likely to be seen as a narrow "law," "political science," "economics," or "sociology" project, and more simply as a book about the specific subject it focuses on (say, the development of property rights, or the behavior of voters). [read post]
9 Sep 2007, 11:33 am
Just as it is not very meaningful for a voter to vote "non-Reagan,"' it is not very helpful to tell a judge to be a "non-originalist. [read post]
4 Jan 2012, 11:03 pm
” See Minor v. [read post]
14 Jan 2023, 2:42 pm
From Iloh v. [read post]
19 Oct 2019, 8:09 am
Supreme Court case, Batson v. [read post]
13 Dec 2023, 9:05 pm
To test this, we classify U.S. states based on the percentage of voters who voted for the Republican or Democrat candidate in the 2016 presidential election. [read post]
13 Dec 2017, 9:01 pm
Révélant qu’elle était jadis timide, elle a fait progresser sa carrière en saisissant les occasions qui s’offraient à elles et en n’hésitant pas à prendre des risques. [read post]
16 Nov 2022, 4:00 am
Not only are voters ill-positioned to hold legislators to account for their reasoning, but the conservative judiciary’s antipathy towards reliance on legislative history makes that reasoning even less rel [read post]
19 Jun 2011, 5:38 am
Just as it is not very meaningful for a voter to vote "non-Reagan,"' it is not very helpful to tell a judge to be a "non-originalist. [read post]
4 Dec 2019, 4:40 am
Justice Scalia provides us with an explanation (Kansas v. [read post]
17 Mar 2016, 2:41 pm
That was in the case of National Labor Relations Board v. [read post]
29 Feb 2024, 6:05 am
Supreme Court had taken on new powers (in their case, the power of constitutional review) in the 1803 case, Marbury v. [read post]
7 Dec 2008, 11:14 pm
Just as it is not very meaningful for a voter to vote "non-Reagan,"' it is not very helpful to tell a judge to be a "non-originalist. [read post]
7 Aug 2023, 3:46 am
In the 2012 United States v. [read post]
12 Jun 2015, 6:25 am
The Supreme Court in McCutcheon v. [read post]
29 Nov 2018, 9:01 pm
Supreme Court has not reviewed a lobbyist registration case since 1954’s United States v. [read post]
