Search for: "Weeks v. United States" Results 6581 - 6600 of 19,103
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Mar 2020, 7:06 am by Christian Grostic, N.D. Ohio
Today, a look at the Sixth Circuit's March 11 decision in United States v. [read post]
23 Jan 2022, 8:55 am by Giorgio Luceri
United States by the U.S. [read post]
13 May 2013, 11:34 am by James J. La Rocca
Additionally, the NLRB may ask the United States Supreme Court to decide the issue. [read post]
9 Nov 2010, 7:15 am by Nabiha Syed
United States, which challenges gender-based residency requirements for transmitting U.S. citizenship. [read post]
15 Apr 2020, 9:59 am
That's the weak version of federalism we see in all sorts of regulation in the United States. [read post]
5 Jun 2017, 12:47 pm by Matthew Kahn
The Fourth Circuit ruled last week in IRAP v. [read post]
13 Jun 2011, 4:14 am by Marie Louise
Activ8-3D (EPLAW) EWPCC deals with unregistered designs: Access plus inspiration need not mean copying: Albert Packaging v Nampak (Class 99) (IPKat) United States US Patent Reform Patent Reform Update: Will the House pass America Invents Act? [read post]
25 May 2010, 7:03 pm by Lyle Denniston
Bennett, et al., seeks to rely in part on the Supreme Court’s controversial ruling in January in Citizens United v. [read post]
29 Mar 2015, 4:02 pm by INFORRM
United States Georgia’s Supreme Court has ruled against a woman who claimed she was stalked online. [read post]
20 Jun 2011, 4:27 am by Marie Louise
  Highlights this week included: The UK Patent Box – more details, not necessarily much more clarification (IP finance) (IP finance) (Solo IP) (IP finance) (Intellectual Property Tax) TTAB Precedential No. 14: Applying collateral estoppel to the ownership issue, TTAB enters summary judgment in “WINNIE THE POOH” trademark dispute: Stephen Slesinger Inc. v. [read post]
21 Nov 2020, 4:11 pm by INFORRM
  It is intended to complement our United States: Monthly Round Up posts. [read post]
29 Mar 2023, 4:39 pm by Eugene Volokh
United States—a case raising crucial questions of religious freedom law and, most importantly, statutory interpretation. [read post]