Search for: "Arizona Supreme Court"
Results 6601 - 6620
of 9,060
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Apr 2010, 7:31 am
Instead, referring to his advertised “right to receive at least $15,000,” in a bit of understatement, the Nevada Supreme Court said el Tigre “grossly misstated the law.” What was the Southern Nevada Disciplinary Commission’s recommended punishment to the court? [read post]
15 Jan 2018, 9:16 am
Restrictions on Prolonged Traffic Stops The Supreme Court highlighted in Arizona v. [read post]
22 Dec 2017, 8:38 am
“Food in good company has sustained Supreme Court Justices through the ages,” writes Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg in her forward to “Table for 9: Supreme Court Food Traditions & Recipes,” by Clare Cushman of the Supreme Court Historical Society. [read post]
20 Mar 2012, 3:46 pm
Arizona, 451 U.S. 477 (1981) to the facts of this case. [read post]
31 May 2010, 9:07 pm
Michael Myers of McClanahan Myers Espey represented families of deceased employees in the Florida Supreme Court this month. [read post]
6 Mar 2023, 6:59 pm
The Supreme Court’s 1963 decision in Arizona v California gave the Secretary the right to reduce different states’ allotments to river water based upon drought conditions. [read post]
10 Jun 2010, 10:30 am
Nevada voters are closely divided over their views of Supreme Court nominee Elena Kagan and over whether she should be confirmed to the high court by the Senate. [read post]
7 May 2015, 6:53 am
Furthermore, even when the lower courts generally agree on an issue, the Supreme Court is free to upset the apple cart, as it did, for example, in Arizona v. [read post]
15 Jul 2010, 2:39 pm
Minn. 1998), the court predicted that Arizona would reject market share liability. [read post]
Glassdoor must produce user info about anonymous reviews relevant to fraud investigation of employer
10 Nov 2017, 7:26 am
It applied the good-faith test established by the Supreme Court in Branzburg v. [read post]
5 Feb 2014, 6:25 am
The Supreme Court has never squarely confronted when such crime-facilitating speech is protected by the First Amendment and when it’s not. [read post]
10 Sep 2018, 11:34 am
Supreme Court regarding the propriety of Google’s $8.5 million privacy settlement related to allegations that the company unlawfully shared users’ search histories. [read post]
24 May 2012, 2:29 pm
The Supreme Court has never squarely confronted this question. [read post]
12 Apr 2015, 8:14 pm
The decision joins another post-DescampsNinth opinion, Marcia-Acosta, in a welcome line limiting the government’s expansive fact-roving to try to make its Taylor showing.How to Use: Descamps¸you will recall, is the 2013 Supreme Court decision guiding the application of the Taylor modified categorical approach. [read post]
29 Dec 2012, 7:58 am
In Phillips, Judge Rakoff gives us a brief but valuable description of the lead Supreme Court case on this abuse, United States v. [read post]
31 Jan 2019, 3:41 pm
Supreme Court Bulletin http://www.narf.org/nill/bulletins/sct/2018-2019update.html Petitions for certiorari were filed recently in:King Mountain Tobacco Company, Inc. v. [read post]
20 Jul 2017, 11:30 am
For precisely this reason, the Supreme Court has held that the First Amendment protects the right to boycott. [read post]
31 Jan 2019, 3:41 pm
Supreme Court Bulletin http://www.narf.org/nill/bulletins/sct/2018-2019update.html Petitions for certiorari were filed recently in:King Mountain Tobacco Company, Inc. v. [read post]
19 Jun 2016, 6:46 pm
A 1976 Supreme Court case, believed to be Kelley v. [read post]
24 Jul 2012, 10:04 am
In a series of cases since 1990, the Supreme Court and the Federal Circuit have concluded this is a taking of the landowner’s right to unencumbered title and possession of their land, and that the Fifth Amendment requires the federal government to pay just compensation. [read post]
