Search for: "Banks v. State" Results 6601 - 6620 of 15,815
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Aug 2015, 2:00 am by Ayesha Christie, Matrix
In contrast, Lord Kerr’s dissenting judgment adopts a far more structured approach to proportionality, closely analysing the four questions identified by Lord Reed in Bank Mellat v HM Treasury (No 2) [2014] AC 700, with particular emphasis on the rational connection between the interference and the legislative objective and the “least intrusive means” test [21]. [read post]
10 Aug 2015, 6:32 pm by Joy Waltemath
Those requiring court approval of private FLSA settlements regularly base their analysis on a pair of Supreme Court cases: Brooklyn Savings Bank v. [read post]
The London head office closed in December 2011, but the branch’s bank accounts were frozen at the end of August 2010. [read post]
9 Aug 2015, 6:03 pm by Kevin LaCroix
” The appellate court added that “other courts interpreting identical insured v. insured exclusions have reached the same conclusion. [read post]
4 Aug 2015, 11:09 am by Tara Hofbauer
[could potentially complicate] matters for President Vladimir V. [read post]
4 Aug 2015, 11:09 am by Tara Hofbauer
[could potentially complicate] matters for President Vladimir V. [read post]
2 Aug 2015, 5:10 pm by Kevin LaCroix
”   Judge Rakoff also rejected the argument that the allegedly misleading statements about the company’s business and management were mere “opinion” or “puffery,” stating that “where (as here alleged) the statements were made repeatedly in an effort to reassure the investing public about the Company’s integrity, a reasonable investor could rely on them as reflective of the true state of affairs at the company. [read post]
2 Aug 2015, 4:01 pm
 Being unsure whether allowing exploitation of works without prior permission from the relevant rightholder is permitted, the French Council of State has just sought guidance from the CJEU. [read post]
30 Jul 2015, 2:03 pm by Lawrence B. Ebert
With this Court’sdecision in State Street Bank & Trust Co. v. [read post]