Search for: "C & S Company, Inc." Results 6601 - 6620 of 7,901
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Apr 2010, 2:15 am by gmlevine
A “party seeking to establish exclusive rights carries a heavy burden of proof for removing the term from the public domain,” Lodging Kit Company Inc. v. [read post]
13 Apr 2010, 9:45 am by Daniel W. Whitney, Esquire
For example, in 2009, Pfizer Inc. reached a settlement with the federal government and states over allegations of health care fraud contained in nine qui tam cases. [read post]
12 Apr 2010, 5:28 am
(not precedential) (TTABlog)   US Trade Marks – Lawsuits and strategic steps Fred Beverages – CAFC hears oral argument in fee payment case: Fred Beverages, Inc v Fred’s Capital Management Company (TTABlog) Mars – Zorro Productions sues Mars and ad agency BBDO Worldwide over ‘Zorro M&M’ (Trademark Blog of the Trademark Lawyer's Mind)     [read post]
12 Apr 2010, 2:05 am by gmlevine
This was implicitly admitted by the Respondent in two early cases, Dow Jones & Company, Inc. and Dow Jones LP v. [read post]
8 Apr 2010, 2:59 am
"The Kentucky company also has some labeling problems. [read post]
7 Apr 2010, 10:01 pm by Scott Wolfe Jr
Design, specifications, workmanship, repair, construction, renovation, remodeling, grading, compaction; c. [read post]
6 Apr 2010, 4:56 am
Shure, Inc (GRAY on Claims) (Patently-O) (EDTexweblog.com) CAFC on relative claim terminology: Power-One, Inc v Artesyn Technologies, Inc (Peter Zura's 271 Patent Blog) (EDTexweblog.com) CAFC: Panel disagrees regarding use of incorporation by reference to identify structure for means-plus-function claims: Pressure Products Medical Supplies, Inc. v. [read post]
6 Apr 2010, 1:58 am by Kevin LaCroix
The plaintiffs also allege waste and breach of fiduciary duty with regard to the companys dividend increase and share buybacks instituted in the month’s preceding the companys near collapse and government rescue. [read post]
5 Apr 2010, 6:16 pm by Eric Schweibenz
  According to the Order, during this conference, the complainant Eastman Kodak Company, and both respondents, Research In Motion Ltd. and Research In Motion Corporation, and Apple Inc. addressed the impact of ALJ Carl C. [read post]