Search for: "M. B.1."
Results 6601 - 6620
of 13,698
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Apr 2018, 3:30 am
Well, mark your calendars for July 1, 2018. [read post]
26 Apr 2018, 3:30 am
Well, mark your calendars for July 1, 2018. [read post]
26 Oct 2011, 2:54 am
” Paragraph 1 of the Rules of the Policy. [read post]
10 Apr 2018, 6:12 pm
First, you’ll enter your name (as indicated by the 1 in the blue circle), along with any D/B/A or trade name. [read post]
10 Dec 2014, 9:30 am
Stephen M. [read post]
25 Oct 2018, 10:16 am
Dena M. [read post]
22 Feb 2008, 8:17 pm
by STEVEN M. [read post]
1 Mar 2016, 12:49 pm
Under Domestic Relations Law § 240(1-b)(h), an agreement with support provisions that deviate from those obligations has to specify how much the obligation would have been under the CSSA and explain why the parties deviated from the guidelines. [read post]
3 Apr 2013, 8:03 pm
Filing an extension may extend the period for claiming refunds (IRC section 6511(b)(2)(A)). [read post]
26 Jun 2012, 7:00 am
Here is a non-exclusive list of the problems I see with such a strategy:1. [read post]
6 Feb 2012, 11:51 pm
The available titles are as follows: 1. [read post]
28 Feb 2012, 2:13 am
By B. [read post]
26 Jun 2012, 4:31 am
b. [read post]
29 Mar 2019, 2:49 pm
The five issues I discuss in the video include: 1) Part A of the test requires that the worker is free from the control and direction of the hiring entity in connection with the performance of the work, both under the contract for the performance of the work and in fact; and 2) Part B of the test requires that the worker performs work that is outside the usual course of the hiring entity’s business; and 3) Part C of the test requires that the worker is customarily… [read post]
27 May 2021, 3:16 pm
Make sure you are ready to win at every phase of the process by retaining the Law Offices of Stephen M. [read post]
2 Feb 2023, 1:16 pm
A violation of the Act would be treated as an unfair or deceptive act or practice prescribed under section 22 18(a)(1)(B) of the Federal Trade Commission Act. [read post]
21 Sep 2010, 2:18 am
It might be noted that Complainant’s predecessor who made the 1(b) trademark application to the USPTO also resided in Colorado. [read post]
21 Aug 2008, 5:36 pm
Subsection (b) Respondent's Brief The proposed changes are primarily stylistic. [read post]
12 Mar 2007, 2:16 am
4) La cour du Québec, comme la cour Supérieure, ne devrait-elle pas pouvoir modifier elle-même ses règles de pratique afin d'augmenter son efficacité? [read post]
17 Apr 2012, 5:00 am
The average Reg D offering is $30 million, but the median Reg D offering is modest in size: approximately $1 million. [read post]
