Search for: "People v J."
Results 6601 - 6620
of 7,247
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Sep 2008, 11:16 am
In UMG Recordings v. [read post]
16 Sep 2008, 2:53 am
Payless Shoesource, Inc., No. 01-1655 (King, J.). [read post]
15 Sep 2008, 10:09 pm
This was followed by Dan Simon, presenting a nice survey experiment (done with Doug Stenstrom and Steven J. [read post]
15 Sep 2008, 2:00 am
Baird, 405 U.S. 438 (1972); id., at 460 (WHITE, J., concurring in result); or among those rights reserved to the people by the Ninth Amendment, Griswold v. [read post]
13 Sep 2008, 11:21 am
McDonough, J.Michael J. [read post]
11 Sep 2008, 12:00 pm
These so called No. 3 (or No. 5) Civil Divisions, can be found at the Supreme People’s Court, all High People’s Courts, Intermediate People’s Courts in all provincial cities and many big cities, and even a few Basic People’s Courts. [read post]
11 Sep 2008, 2:21 am
Lipsey, and magistrates such as Magistrate John J. [read post]
10 Sep 2008, 7:56 pm
Supreme Court ruled in Lawrence v. [read post]
10 Sep 2008, 12:07 am
"Sometimes people marry for money, and sometimes people kill for money. [read post]
9 Sep 2008, 5:04 pm
Entertainment v. [read post]
9 Sep 2008, 4:49 pm
Miscellaneous * Two interesting studies recently about people's response to spam. [read post]
9 Sep 2008, 7:24 am
Cartoon Network LP v. [read post]
9 Sep 2008, 6:16 am
From the dissent of Judge Damon J. [read post]
5 Sep 2008, 11:01 pm
& Ors v Deisel Spa and Case C-302/08 Zino Davidoff SA v Bendesfinanzdirektion Sudost: (Class 46), EPO Boards of Appeal finds that when a fax is transmitted and an ‘OK’ is noted by the sender, this is evidence that the transmission was successful: (IPKat), Professor Hugenholtz slams European Commission for ignoring evidence on copyright extension: (Techdirt) Germany Federal Patent Court publishes guidelines on colour trade mark Signal Yellow:… [read post]
3 Sep 2008, 8:57 am
V(1)(J)(4) & (6) specifies "majority" as a default, but speaks only to votes of the entire Board. [read post]
2 Sep 2008, 5:54 am
Most people misassume that 512(c) eliminates all liability for user-caused copyright infringement, but it only eliminates damages and limits the scope of injunctive relief in 512(j)--but a court can still issue an injunction. 512(j) is, as far as I know, not been litigated, and frankly I don't understand all of its provisions. [read post]
30 Aug 2008, 11:57 pm
Several people have commented that switching from grain to grass feeding could be one of the solutions to the problem with foodborne pathogens in cattle and other livestock. [read post]
30 Aug 2008, 3:17 am
State v. [read post]
29 Aug 2008, 11:24 am
In Io Group, Inc. v. [read post]
25 Aug 2008, 11:04 pm
There may be some people affected who are within the order yet unnamed. [read post]
