Search for: "Plaintiff(s)" Results 6601 - 6620 of 178,471
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Oct 2008, 11:55 am
Defense attorneys moved in limine to preclude any evidence not produced pursuant to Rule 26; ultimately, the district court severed the named plaintiffs’ claims from the opt-in plaintiffs because of the court’s concern that plaintiffs’ lawyer “did not have a solid understanding of his clients' damages. [read post]
5 Oct 2011, 6:11 am by Stanley D. Baum
Third, if the employer does so, the plaintiff must raise a triable issue that the employer's proffered reason is a pretext for age discrimination. [read post]
5 Aug 2018, 6:14 am by Seyfarth Shaw LLP
The Court’s Decision The Court held that it had subject-matter jurisdiction to hear Plaintiffs state-law claims, and granted in part and denied in part Plaintiffs state law claims. [read post]
16 Oct 2023, 11:00 pm
” When a personal injury lawsuit was later filed against the City of New York, the New York County Supreme Court ended up granting the municipality’s motion (via summary judgment) for a pre-trial dismissal in its favor.On appeal, the Appellate Division, First Department, noted that an owner’s usual duty to take reasonable precautions with respect to a property’s condition didn’t apply to “natural geographic phenomena that are open and… [read post]
9 Jan 2013, 5:42 am by Seyfarth Shaw LLP
 Notably, the Court found the named plaintiff Stephanie Odle’s individual claims, and the class claims, could not benefit from the Supreme Court’s 1974 decision in American Pipe & Construction Co. v. [read post]
10 Aug 2010, 6:20 am
District Court in Indiana ordered a plaintiff to turn over photos and messages from her Facebook page. [read post]
12 Jun 2020, 12:31 pm by DeFrancisco & Falgiatano
In other words, even if a plaintiff has a meritorious claim, if he or she does not move his or her case along in a reasonable fashion as required under New York law, the plaintiffs claim may be dismissed, despite the fact that the defendant may have caused the plaintiffs harm. [read post]
1 Jun 2020, 3:00 am by Daniel E. Cummins, Esq.
However, he limited his allowance of the Plaintiff's discovery requests to only cover information for a four year period, which was selected as that is the statute of limitations for a breach of contract action. [read post]
13 Nov 2022, 4:17 pm by DeFrancisco & Falgiatano
Proving a Doctor Proximately Caused a Patient’s Harm On appeal, the court reversed the trial court ruling and dismissed the plaintiffs complaint in its entirety. [read post]
28 Feb 2014, 7:21 pm by Gregory J. Brodzik
Fallon issued a report recommending the denial of plaintiffs’ motion to stay pending the PTO’s inter partes review ("IPR") determination regarding the validity of United States Patent Nos. 6,074,503; 7,135,641; 7,977,575; and 7,663,061. [read post]
21 Jun 2013, 2:58 am by R. David Donoghue
Judge Shadur sua sponte ordered plaintiff Zambezia Film to provide the Court a courtesy copy of its recently filed copyright complaints in both of the cases. [read post]
5 May 2015, 10:11 pm by Patricia Salkin
Plaintiff 62–64 Main Street, LLC owned Block 205, Lots 4, 5, 6, and 7, and Plaintiff 59–61 Moore Street L.L.C. owned Block 205, Lot 8 (collectively “Plaintiffs”) and they intended to build a bank on the five lots, but could not secure site-plan approval from the City’s Planning Board or the necessary variances from the City’s Board of Adjustment to go forward with their proposals. [read post]
16 Dec 2022, 1:41 pm by Eugene Volokh
The post Judge Plans to Block California Fee-Shifting Statute That Targets Gun Lawsuit Plaintiffs (and Lawyers) appeared first on Reason.com. [read post]
9 Nov 2007, 3:06 am
 Judge Guzman adopted Magistrate Judge Keys’s Report and Recommendation in its entirety, awarding plaintiff all of the approximately $800,000 in attorney’s fees and costs plaintiff sought pursuant to the fee-shifting provision in the parties’ agreement and Fed. [read post]
30 Mar 2012, 11:24 am by Kevin
That does sometimes happen as people rush to jump on the bandwagon; I've seen complaints where the prior plaintiff's name still appears in the complaint, because the lawyers just changed the names in the caption and didn't bother to proofread the thing before filing it. [read post]
19 Feb 2015, 7:07 pm by Kenneth S. Nankin
The court granted the airline’s motion and denied the plaintiffs motion. [read post]