Search for: "Sales v. State" Results 6601 - 6620 of 21,156
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Aug 2017, 3:26 am
However, a “significant portion of the remainder of the goods” are legitimate products whose sale, nonetheless, for various reasons had not been authorized by the relevant trade mark owners. [read post]
4 Aug 2017, 9:08 am by Joe Rosenbaum
 In a 1946 Supreme Court case Securities and Exchange Commission v. [read post]
4 Aug 2017, 6:33 am by Carl Neff
 Carl is admitted in the State of Delaware and regularly practices before the Delaware Court of Chancery, with an emphasis on shareholder disputes. [read post]
4 Aug 2017, 5:00 am by John Jascob
Under Exchange Act Section 16(b) and Rule 16b-6, the entities were required to disgorge profits only up to the amount of the premium received by the writer of the put, the panel stated (Olagues v. [read post]
3 Aug 2017, 8:19 am by Joy Waltemath
Over the course of their 20-year history, the parties agreed that conversations up to two minutes may occur on the sales floor. [read post]
3 Aug 2017, 7:24 am by Colby Pastre
The tax, which is 24 times the state excise tax rate on beer, has received mixed reviews among constituents. [read post]