Search for: "State v. Force"
Results 6601 - 6620
of 32,544
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Jul 2020, 11:01 am
Our phased reopening in conditions where case incidence remains high ensures a long and slow recovery, not a V-shaped recovery. [read post]
20 Jul 2020, 6:30 am
” Take, for example, his statement that Burwell v. [read post]
20 Jul 2020, 3:48 am
[¶] No actual corporate benefit has been stated and there is no evidence that proper judgment was exercised either. [read post]
19 Jul 2020, 10:04 am
Abrams' opinion in Reynolds v. [read post]
19 Jul 2020, 7:17 am
Vasquez, Inc. v. [read post]
18 Jul 2020, 4:57 pm
As a result, on May 27, 2020, the Secretary of State announced that the PRC had fundamentally undermined Hong Kong’s autonomy and certified and reported to the Congress, pursuant to sections 205 and 301 of the United States-Hong Kong Policy Act of 1992, as amended, respectively, that Hong Kong no longer warrants treatment under United States law in the same manner as United States laws were applied to Hong Kong before July 1, 1997. [read post]
18 Jul 2020, 11:18 am
Henning Lahmann (ESMT Berlin - Digital Society Institute) has posted 'Hacking Back' by States and the Uneasy Place of Necessity within the Rule of Law (Zeitschrift für Ausländisches Öffentliches Recht und Völkerrecht, forthcoming). [read post]
18 Jul 2020, 9:40 am
At that time Colorado had two strong Defense of Marriage provisions, one in the Constitution and the other statutory, not only barring the celebration of same-sex marriages in the state but denying in-state recognition to valid out-of-state same-sex marriages.[4] The federal government had its own DOMA.[5] But Massachusetts had recognized same-sex marriage.[6]Phillips met with them personally and, when he heard that the cake was intended as a celebration… [read post]
18 Jul 2020, 2:51 am
Such modes of service where the defendant is likely to be domiciled in another state have been condemned as insufficient by the ECJ in cases such as: Case 166/80 Peter Klomps v Karl Michel [1981] ECR 1593; Case C-300/14 Imtech Marine Belgium NV v Radio Hellenic SA ECLI:EU:C:2015:825; Case C-289/17 Collect Inkasso OU v Aint 2018 EU:C:2018. [read post]
17 Jul 2020, 2:24 pm
The Casa de Maryland v. [read post]
17 Jul 2020, 10:46 am
Ass’n of United States, Inc. v. [read post]
17 Jul 2020, 5:52 am
Anders, and Sabastian V. [read post]
17 Jul 2020, 4:00 am
The complaint (full text) in Calvary Chapel of Ukiah v. [read post]
16 Jul 2020, 6:02 pm
But courts do the interpreting under the court order standard, so diversity of state laws is not the issue.) [read post]
16 Jul 2020, 12:58 pm
In addition, foot voting can be a force for positive change in immigrants’ countries of origin. [read post]
16 Jul 2020, 12:24 pm
interest payments on any business mortgage obligation on real or personal property that was incurred before February 15, 2020 (but not any prepayment or payment of principal); payments on business rent obligations on the real or personal property under a lease agreement in force before February 15, 2020; and business utility payments for the distribution of electricity, gas, water, transportation, telephone, or internet access for which service began before February 15, 2020. [read post]
16 Jul 2020, 9:17 am
The destination state may, for example, have an ‘adequacy decision’ that means that the state in question ensures an adequate (roughly equivalent) level of protection to the ensured by the GDPR (Article 45 GDPR). [read post]
16 Jul 2020, 6:33 am
Jones v. [read post]
15 Jul 2020, 6:13 pm
Along with the rise of legal positivism, international law became perceived as the body of law dealing with external aspects of States or, in other words, with relationships between States. [read post]
15 Jul 2020, 10:07 am
Now, probably more than ever, a particular focus should be put on the data exporter’s evaluation of the legal developments in the recipient state. [read post]
