Search for: "Tenant 1"
Results 6601 - 6620
of 6,865
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Mar 2008, 2:34 pm
” § 732.401(1), Fla. [read post]
22 Mar 2008, 10:25 am
As a former in-house attorney, I can tell you that the expectations for outside counsel are generally relatively simple: (1) be attentive and responsive; (2) keep an eye on costs; (3) whenever possible, provide me with a positive outcome. [read post]
20 Mar 2008, 4:38 pm
The court disagreed with the tenants' argument that the Illinois Landlord-Tenant Act (765 ILCS 705/1(a)), which provides: "(a) Except as otherwise provided in subsection (b), every covenant, agreement, or understanding in or in connection with or collateral to any lease of real property, exempting the lessor from liability for damages for injuries to person or property caused by or resulting from the negligence of the lessor, his or her… [read post]
20 Mar 2008, 1:11 am
InconigliosKINGS COUNTYLabor LawLadder Not Item to Be Hoisted or Secured Under Labor Law §240(1); Defendants Granted DismissalMollano v. [read post]
19 Mar 2008, 4:24 pm
Applying Landlord-Tenant Law to Residents in Shelters Matthew R. [read post]
18 Mar 2008, 10:00 am
As our state's highest court noted in that opinion:To trigger further judicial scrutiny, an aggrieved shareholder-tenant must make a showing that the board acted (1) outside the scope of its authority, (2) in a way that did not legitimately further the corporate purpose or (3) in bad faith.Since he couldn't prove the existence of at least one of these three factors, Pelton's case could not survive. [read post]
17 Mar 2008, 1:25 pm
Since the agreement’s enforceability was a focal point of the case, and the tenant was found to have asserted a “material factual statement” that was false, the court awarded costs to the cooperative.When the Appellate Term, First Department, affirmed on appeal, we doubt the tenant-shareholder sanctioned the outcome.To download a copy of the Appellate Term’s decision, please use this link: 1050 Tenants Corp. v. [read post]
17 Mar 2008, 3:27 am
Such damage is not normal wear and tear and is due to the negligence of the tenant. [read post]
14 Mar 2008, 3:14 pm
"In assessing whether damages can be claimed as a result of the smell of cigarette smoke, the tribunal member relied on section 62(1) of the Act and concluded that damage must be considered within the "purpose for which the rental unit was intended to be rented. [read post]
13 Mar 2008, 3:37 pm
S.121(1) HA 1985 provides: “The right to buy cannot be exercised if the tenant is obliged to give up possession of the dwelling-house in pursuance of an order of the court or will be so obliged at a date specified in the order. [read post]
12 Mar 2008, 3:57 am
The officers instead sought the consent of an authorized co-tenant. [read post]
11 Mar 2008, 9:22 am
Back in August 2006, a three-judge Eighth Circuit panel divided 2-1 in holding that the consent received from the second co-tenant did not override the first co-tenant's refusal of consent. [read post]
10 Mar 2008, 6:25 am
(“NFM”) entered into a lease which provided that "possession of the premises should be given to [World Monuments] upon lease signing, but no later than May 1, 2000, and that rent should commence three months after lease signing, but no later than August 1, 2000. [read post]
8 Mar 2008, 2:35 pm
However, although one co-tenant may authorize a search of a home, such authorization is insufficient if another co-tenant is present and objects to the search. [read post]
6 Mar 2008, 12:19 pm
1. [read post]
5 Mar 2008, 1:28 pm
Assured tenant or trespasser? [read post]
4 Mar 2008, 2:49 pm
(2) Subsection (1) has effect subject toâ€â [read post]
4 Mar 2008, 8:07 am
Hours for the Center are 1-4:00 p.m. on Mondays and 10 a.m. [read post]
3 Mar 2008, 1:50 pm
Housing Act 1996 s.167 provides: “(1) Every local housing authority shall have a scheme (their ‘allocation scheme’) for determining priorities, and as to the procedure to be followed, in allocating housing accommodation. [read post]
3 Mar 2008, 5:06 am
Defendant's remaining silent while present and observing co-tenant consent to a police search is hardly an objection under Randolph. [read post]
