Search for: "True v. United States"
Results 6601 - 6620
of 9,191
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Feb 2010, 4:02 am
Premium Aircraft (EPLAW) United States US General Team Conan leaving jokes behind (IP Osgoode) US Patent Reform Patent Reform legislation update (Inventive Step) US Patents First-to-file vs first-to-invent: Why is there a Dispute? [read post]
24 Nov 2024, 9:01 pm
A variant on this argument is that trans individuals join the military only for gender-affirming care and will leave shortly after receiving operations, thus affecting unit cohesion and readiness. [read post]
15 Aug 2024, 12:39 pm
., United States v. [read post]
9 May 2013, 9:01 pm
In particular, the Kentucky case, Kant v. [read post]
5 Jul 2022, 1:26 pm
United States, 146 F.3d 1358, 1362-63 (Fed. [read post]
12 Apr 2021, 9:03 pm
In that case, the ECJ was asked to consider the validity of the Standard Contractual Clauses Decision and the Privacy Shield—the two mechanisms under which the data of European citizens were being transferred to the United States under Part V of the GDPR. [read post]
14 Sep 2016, 10:36 am
On August 29, 2016, the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit, in Vasquez v. [read post]
1 Dec 2023, 11:16 am
The law, in its preamble, stated these objectives: WHEREAS, the People’s Republic of China is an adversary of the United States and Montana and has an interest in gathering information about Montanans, Montana companies, and the intellectual property of users to engage in corporate and international espionage…. [read post]
25 Nov 2019, 2:54 pm
And only one of these decisions found that substantial transformation occurred in the United States, [v] with the other decisions concluding that substantial transformation occurred internationally. [read post]
9 Apr 2012, 3:12 pm
For example, if the same conservative and liberal switch from discussing Citizens United to Boumediene v. [read post]
22 Nov 2008, 2:59 pm
In Sims v. [read post]
15 Apr 2024, 1:06 am
embedded-checkout=true. [read post]
29 Jan 2024, 10:46 am
Constitution which provides that, “The United States shall … protect each [state] against invasion. [read post]
11 Jan 2011, 7:31 pm
In this, my third and final post on the Ninth Circuit en banc decision in Byrd v. [read post]
10 Jun 2010, 9:38 am
(As I discussed in a prior post on the Forest Group v. [read post]
31 May 2012, 10:14 am
Professor Brand cites the wording of the public policy exception in the Hague Choice of Courts Convention to mean that the ship has “not only set sail in the United States, but globally as well” and articulates a “global position. [read post]
25 Jul 2012, 11:06 am
The United States District Court for the Northern District considered this question in a recent case. [read post]
7 Jun 2010, 3:57 pm
In clause 5 of that agreement, the watchmaker undertook not to object to the engineers' use or registration in the United Kingdom of certain "excluded goods". [read post]
2 Dec 2010, 8:29 pm
As the Court explained in United States v. [read post]
15 Dec 2007, 4:40 am
United States v. [read post]
