Search for: "United States v. Minor"
Results 6601 - 6620
of 7,104
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Sep 2008, 7:15 pm
In US v. [read post]
2 Sep 2008, 5:17 pm
State of Tennessee, No. 06-6208 In civil rights suit alleging that city police discriminated against plaintiffs in violation of the Ame [read post]
29 Aug 2008, 8:26 am
This is from Peter V. [read post]
28 Aug 2008, 6:16 pm
See Ashcroft v. [read post]
28 Aug 2008, 2:15 pm
Mitchell, No. 02-3505 Denial of a petition for habeas relief in a death penalty case is reversed where: 1) a state court applied the Strickland standard in an objectively unreasonable manner for purposes of claims that petitioner's counsel were ineffective in preparing for the sentencing phase of his trial; 2) the state court unreasonably determined that the alleged errors of trial counsel did not prejudice petitioner's case; and 3) a state court erroneously… [read post]
26 Aug 2008, 2:07 am
Star Scientific, Inc. v. [read post]
22 Aug 2008, 3:07 pm
The reason it's fiction is that there never has been one case in the entire United States of minors buying wine online in order to get "crunk," as the kids say. [read post]
21 Aug 2008, 8:09 pm
In United States v. [read post]
15 Aug 2008, 5:40 pm
Schlatter, Jr., ("Schlatter") pleaded guilty in DeKalb Superior Court to Class B felony sexual misconduct with a minor. [read post]
15 Aug 2008, 3:29 pm
AND NAGAKRISHNA REDDY, M.D. v. [read post]
14 Aug 2008, 6:16 pm
State of Indiana (NFP) [read post]
14 Aug 2008, 5:49 am
Here is the abstract:The egalitarian voice of the United States Supreme Court resonates forty years after it abolished anti-miscegenation laws in Loving v. [read post]
14 Aug 2008, 4:15 am
In an important and lengthy new opinion, United States v. [read post]
13 Aug 2008, 6:01 pm
State of Indiana (NFP) Jerald Anthony Minzey v. [read post]
12 Aug 2008, 7:18 pm
New York City Bd of Educ 465 F.3d 503, 46 IDELR 181 (2d Cir. 10/12/2006), the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit was presented with the school district's argument that partial implementation of IEPs constituted the necessary "substantial compliance" required by IDEA. [read post]
OH11: Judicial intergrity justifies exclusion; warrantless entry for noise complaint was unjustified
10 Aug 2008, 3:30 pm
State v. [read post]
10 Aug 2008, 6:36 am
In United States v. [read post]
10 Aug 2008, 1:09 am
(Gosselin v. [read post]
8 Aug 2008, 12:30 pm
Rosenberg v. [read post]
7 Aug 2008, 8:14 am
Sobel, The Mythology of a Human Rights Leader: How the United States has Failed Sexual Minorities at Home and AbroadRichard L. [read post]
