Search for: "United States v. Place" Results 6601 - 6620 of 24,125
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Mar 2019, 7:24 am by Katherine Kelley
Like the original Brookings report, I collected data on sextortion occurring both within and outside of the United States. [read post]
19 Mar 2019, 5:30 am by Kevin
 See “United States v. 1855.6 Pounds of American Paddlefish Meat” (Nov. 14, 2018) and “Update: The Paddlefish Defendants Are Now for Sale” (Jan. 28, 2019). [read post]
18 Mar 2019, 3:40 pm
  Sometimes experience is good, and sometimes it's good to instead get someone who perhaps brings a fresh perspective that's not been formed (and/or jaded) by prior work in the area.Which is why, for example, we don't have any service qualifications to become, say, President of the United States. [read post]
18 Mar 2019, 2:29 pm by Amy Howe
The act also requires employees to verify that they are eligible to work in the United States by submitting a Form I-9, and it strictly limits the use of information on or attached to a Form I-9. [read post]
18 Mar 2019, 1:28 pm by Hanlon Law, PA
The Eighth Amendment of the United States Constitution protects a criminal defendant who is convicted of a crime from cruel and unusual punishment. [read post]
18 Mar 2019, 3:52 am by Joy Waltemath
“to avoid detection and suspicion for violating United States immigration laws. [read post]
15 Mar 2019, 12:46 pm by Florian Mueller
Qualcomm case in San Diego said at various investigative hearings held by the United States Federal Trade Commission (FTC). [read post]
15 Mar 2019, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
"As to considering hearsay evidence in an administrative hearing, the Appellate Division said that "hearsay is admissible as competent evidence in an administrative proceeding, and if sufficiently relevant and probative may constitute substantial evidence even if contradicted by live testimony on credibility grounds" [see Matter of Watson v New York State Justice Ctr. for the Protection of People with Special Needs, 152 AD3d 1025]. [read post]
15 Mar 2019, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
"As to considering hearsay evidence in an administrative hearing, the Appellate Division said that "hearsay is admissible as competent evidence in an administrative proceeding, and if sufficiently relevant and probative may constitute substantial evidence even if contradicted by live testimony on credibility grounds" [see Matter of Watson v New York State Justice Ctr. for the Protection of People with Special Needs, 152 AD3d 1025]. [read post]