Search for: "Voter v. Voter"
Results 6601 - 6620
of 6,772
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Jun 2007, 8:50 am
That is in form exactly the same rationale that the Court has used in the past -- most notably, in Austin v. [read post]
13 Jun 2007, 10:21 pm
Attorneys/Voter Fraud controversies, as well as updated statistics on the amount of election law litigation in 2005 and 2006. [read post]
11 Jun 2007, 9:34 am
The opinion in Purdue v. [read post]
11 Jun 2007, 5:37 am
In the Federal Election Commission v. [read post]
8 Jun 2007, 4:48 pm
” Yet in 1998, Southwick agreed in Richmond v. [read post]
4 Jun 2007, 6:02 am
" [link]It will be recalled that Musharraf was swept into office with 98 percent of the official tally in an April 2002 referendum that presented voters with no opponents and the following ballot question:Do you want to elect President General Pervez Musharraf as President of Pakistan for next five years for the survival of local government system, restoration of democracy, continuity and stability of reforms, eradication of extremism and sectarianism and for the accomplishment of… [read post]
4 Jun 2007, 12:14 am
Glucksberg and Vacco v. [read post]
30 May 2007, 11:50 pm
Many voters viewed LeMay as a dangerous choice that reflected badly on Wallace; they saw Nixon as a better and safer alternative. [read post]
29 May 2007, 11:51 pm
Darby and Wickard v. [read post]
29 May 2007, 6:00 pm
Coker v. [read post]
24 May 2007, 9:18 am
Articles concerning the latest filings in Halverson v. [read post]
24 May 2007, 1:26 am
Rosa DeLauro and Diana DeGette Letter requests the President to use the Strategic Economic Dialogue between the U.S and China as an opportunity to reach an agreement on food imports that establishes genuine transparency and equivalent food safety regulations between both countries 05/23/2007
Letter to the Chairman of the House Ways and Means Subcommittee on Health from the California Medical Association (PDF 117 KB) Letter supports elimination of the Medicare Advantage Private… [read post]
23 May 2007, 5:23 am
" In the 2002 case, Republican Party of Minnesota v. [read post]
19 May 2007, 5:14 pm
The "billionaire loophole" arises because Supreme Court doctrine since Buckley v. [read post]
19 May 2007, 4:20 pm
Curtis v. [read post]
17 May 2007, 12:16 pm
Today, the Wall Street Journal has this editorial on the bill that amends the law at issue in the Davenport v. [read post]
16 May 2007, 3:46 pm
The ILB has just learned that the ACLU-represented plaintiffs and the Indiana Democratic Party have each made final decisions to file separate but complementary cert petitions in Crawford v. [read post]
15 May 2007, 11:16 am
Co. v. [read post]
14 May 2007, 8:49 am
And on the merits, the military's highly inadequate Combatant Status Review Tribunals, which decide what suspects to incarcerate as "enemy combatants," do provide protections consistent with the Geneva Conventions and the Supreme Court's 2004 Hamdi v. [read post]
14 May 2007, 8:03 am
(Brown v. [read post]
