Search for: "Weeks v. United States" Results 6601 - 6620 of 19,103
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Oct 2017, 6:09 pm
The panel members were Mattias Zigann, the presiding judge of the Munich Regional Court, Philip Kerr of Allens Linklaters and Larry Welch, the Senior Director, and Assistant General Patent Counsel at Eli Lilly and Company.Mr Ludwig explained that the question of what relief was appropriate had been highlighted by the very recent decision of the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit in AMGEN INC & ors v. [read post]
17 Oct 2017, 1:52 pm by Erica Townes
The United States Supreme Court will address again whether service advisors are exempt from overtime compensation requirements of the Fair Labor Standards Act (“FLSA”). [read post]
17 Oct 2017, 1:52 pm by Erica Townes
The United States Supreme Court will address again whether service advisors are exempt from overtime compensation requirements of the Fair Labor Standards Act (“FLSA”). [read post]
17 Oct 2017, 11:18 am by Garrett Hinck
Iraq experts said the United State’s neutral stance was a de facto endorsement of the Iraqi action. [read post]
17 Oct 2017, 4:21 am by Edith Roberts
The most high-profile grant was in United States v. [read post]
17 Oct 2017, 4:00 am by Michel Paradis
John Baker, excused the civilian members of the trial defense team in the military commission of United States v. [read post]
16 Oct 2017, 8:55 am by Amy Howe
The highest-profile grant of the day came in United States v. [read post]
15 Oct 2017, 7:34 pm by Larry
Of course, the 1983 case was under the old Tariff Schedule of the United States. [read post]
15 Oct 2017, 7:28 pm by Larry
I will have a lot of time in airplanes this week, so I’ll try and knock out some updates.Kent International, Inc. v. [read post]
13 Oct 2017, 6:49 am by Yishai Schwartz
” Crucially, the same resolution explicitly states that the parties’ “participation in the JCPOA is contingent upon the United Nations Security Council… requir[ing] States to comply with the provisions in this statement. [read post]
13 Oct 2017, 6:49 am by Yishai Schwartz
” Crucially, the same resolution explicitly states that the parties’ “participation in the JCPOA is contingent upon the United Nations Security Council… requir[ing] States to comply with the provisions in this statement. [read post]
13 Oct 2017, 6:09 am by Jeff Welty
United States, and you can check out SCOTUSblog’s coverage here. [read post]
12 Oct 2017, 9:19 am by John Elwood
For example, a case with a caption like United States v. [read post]