Search for: "Welling v. Welling"
Results 6601 - 6620
of 110,298
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Mar 2023, 2:44 am
In that great old case, Ladbroke (Football) Ltd v. [read post]
29 Mar 2023, 9:01 pm
Critical sector companies and their third-party infrastructure providers in particular should become familiar with the recent examples of federal cybersecurity standards as well as National Institute of Standards and Technology (“NIST”) guidelines that have informed these new regulatory requirements. [read post]
29 Mar 2023, 4:39 pm
In Lyng v. [read post]
29 Mar 2023, 2:30 pm
ShareTuesday’s argument in Lora v. [read post]
29 Mar 2023, 11:07 am
State v Family Bank of Hallandale, 667 So2d 257 (Fla. 1st DCA 1995) is a case that can be used to show subsequent servicer liability: The law is well established that an unqualified assignment transfers to the assignee all the interests and rights of the assignor in and to the thing assigned. [read post]
29 Mar 2023, 11:06 am
PRC Race Suit According to EEOC’s complaint in EEOC v PRC Industries, Inc. [read post]
29 Mar 2023, 10:31 am
In Huawei v. [read post]
29 Mar 2023, 8:28 am
Flores v. [read post]
29 Mar 2023, 6:30 am
However, in a December 2022 decision, Garfield v. [read post]
29 Mar 2023, 6:30 am
However, in a December 2022 decision, Garfield v. [read post]
29 Mar 2023, 6:05 am
Earlier this month, U.S. [read post]
29 Mar 2023, 6:00 am
It is well settled that, "when an employer and a union enter into a collective bargaining agreement that creates a grievance procedure, an employee subject to the agreement may not sue the employer directly for breach of that agreement but must proceed, through the union, in accordance with the contract" (Matter of Board of Educ., Commack Union Free School Dist. v Ambach, 70 NY2d 501, 508 [1987], cert denied 485 US 1034 [1988]; see Clark v County of Cayuga, 212… [read post]
29 Mar 2023, 6:00 am
It is well settled that, "when an employer and a union enter into a collective bargaining agreement that creates a grievance procedure, an employee subject to the agreement may not sue the employer directly for breach of that agreement but must proceed, through the union, in accordance with the contract" (Matter of Board of Educ., Commack Union Free School Dist. v Ambach, 70 NY2d 501, 508 [1987], cert denied 485 US 1034 [1988]; see Clark v County of Cayuga, 212… [read post]
29 Mar 2023, 5:09 am
As importers operate in this tougher trade environment, they will do well to keep in mind the following practice points: The UFLPA supersedes, effective 21 June 2022, the adjudicative processes used by CBP in connection with forced labor WROs and Findings. [read post]
29 Mar 2023, 5:01 am
If you just blithely ignore it, and publish the story despite having been told that it may well be mistaken, that would be textbook "reckless disregard," which would allow liability even in a public official case: Consider, for instance, Harte-Hanks Communications, Inc. v. [read post]
29 Mar 2023, 3:57 am
Luxco, Inc. v. [read post]
29 Mar 2023, 3:24 am
These doctors confirmed that Mount Sinai did send two clinicians to plaintiffs home, based on a referral from NYC Well (Id. at iJ26). [read post]
29 Mar 2023, 2:59 am
” Morrison v. [read post]
28 Mar 2023, 9:01 pm
This summary must include (i) the person or persons affected; (ii) the date the incident was discovered and whether it is ongoing; (iii) whether any data was stolen, altered, accessed or used for any unauthorized purpose; (iv) the effect of the incident on the entity’s operations; and (v) whether the incident has been remediated or is currently being remediated. [read post]
28 Mar 2023, 6:00 pm
Vanda Pharm. v. [read post]
