Search for: "Fair v. State"
Results 6621 - 6640
of 27,412
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Sep 2010, 5:07 am
See Hurley v. [read post]
16 Jan 2011, 7:39 am
Martel Building Ltd. v Canada, [1997] 129 FTR 249 (FCTD), revd [1998] 163 DLR (4th) 504 (FCA), leave to appeal refused, 2000 SCC 60, [2000] 2 SCR 860, online: LexUM http://scc.lexum.org/en/2000/2000scc60/2000scc60.html Facts Note: This case deals with the possibility of a tort action in negligence for breach of a duty of care during negotiation of a contract (specifically during the solicitation and evaluation of tendered bids). [read post]
23 Jun 2010, 11:53 am
On June 22, 2010, the Court of Appeals released Judge Borrello’s opinion in People v. [read post]
19 Jan 2011, 3:30 am
Becher v. [read post]
10 Feb 2012, 9:40 am
Fair Federal Sentencing Last week, the ACLU’s Criminal Law Reform Project filed an amicus brief in Hill v. [read post]
16 Nov 2011, 10:45 am
Certiorari-stage documents Petition for certiorari Memorandum for the United States Wetzel v. [read post]
8 Jan 2019, 7:36 am
Unlike Frank v. [read post]
3 Jan 2022, 10:50 am
” This is the first redistricting in Georgia since the 2013 Supreme Court decision Shelby County v. [read post]
21 Apr 2011, 1:37 pm
Recently, the a Federal Court in the State of New York was asked to decide whether the Spike television show, “Pros v. [read post]
21 Apr 2011, 1:34 pm
Recently, the a Federal Court in the State of New York was asked to decide whether the Spike television show, “Pros v. [read post]
12 Nov 2008, 4:46 pm
The way in which the Court decides this case will influence whether state postconviction courts believe they are required to provide a minimally fair process in order for their decisions to be steeled from federal review by the provisions of the AEDPA. 2. [read post]
7 Aug 2014, 7:43 am
The Court cited Article 249 EC which states that ‘a decision shall be binding in its entirety upon those to whom it is addressed’ and the case of AssiDomän Kraft Products AB v Commission of the European Communities [1999] ECR I-5363 (Case C-310/97). [read post]
29 Mar 2016, 8:42 am
State v. [read post]
10 Mar 2010, 9:46 am
In Holland v. [read post]
1 Apr 2011, 9:49 am
The United States Supreme Court’s decision in Citizens United v. [read post]
28 Nov 2019, 4:03 pm
Moreover, the Court concluded that the authorities had failed to strike a fair balance between the right to freedom of expression and the need to protect public morals and the rights of others. [read post]
11 Jan 2011, 12:31 pm
In my opinion, nearly everyone would be well served to view themselves as the duality of one-person venture/consciously assembled network (21st century thinking) rather than the outdated employee/employer (or, for that matter, citizen/Nation-State, but that's the story for another essay).Of course, when it comes to law, or any other profession that deals with such complexity, the reality of "venture of one" runs into the need for training, skill building, mentorship,… [read post]
5 Apr 2017, 4:00 am
Lanigan v. [read post]
7 Oct 2022, 4:22 pm
See also Canadian Broadcasting Corp. v. [read post]
10 Aug 2010, 9:53 am
The Seventh Circuit in EEOC v. [read post]
