Search for: "MATTER OF C A" Results 6621 - 6640 of 36,781
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Aug 2008, 6:00 pm
"(c) all parties to the agreement expressly agree in writing . . . to its disclosure. [read post]
16 Nov 2017, 7:38 am by Yosie Saint-Cyr
The minister would be obligated to investigate the complaint unless the minister is of the opinion that the complaint has been adequately dealt with and the matter is trivial, frivolous or vexatious. [read post]
21 Sep 2016, 12:28 pm by David Cosgrove
  Upon Lickiss's motion, the federal district court remanded the matter back to the state superior court, ruling that it did not have subject matter jurisdiction over the case because there is no statute, rule or regulation imposing a duty on FINRA to expunge….Had Lickiss merely petitioned the court for expungement relief under rule 2080, without also invoking the court's equitable powers, that might be the end of the matter. [read post]
25 Oct 2019, 7:28 am by John Jascob
" The provision cited is CEA Section 2(a)(10)(C), which states: "Whenever the Commission issues for official publication any opinion, release, rule, order, interpretation, or other determination on a matter, the Commission shall provide that any dissenting, concurring, or separate opinion by any Commissioner on the matter be published in full along with the Commission opinion, release, rule, order, interpretation, or determination. [read post]
11 Aug 2017, 9:10 am by Rebecca Tushnet
  9thCir.: functionality b/c of psychological and health benefits (claimed). [read post]
9 Feb 2012, 5:00 am by Bexis
  Now, §1447(c) expressly provides:If at any time before final judgment it appears that the district court lacks subject matter jurisdiction, the case shall be remanded. [read post]
24 Jan 2008, 3:06 am
Register No. 156 at page 46709 (August 14, 2006).Where there is a dispute when the child turns three years old and is transitioning from Part C to Part B, the public agency is not required to continue Part C services: if the child is found eligible and there is parental consent, the public agency must provide the services that are not in dispute as stay put. 34 CFR Section 300.518(c); 71 Fed. [read post]
31 Jan 2015, 1:20 pm by Marta Requejo
The CJEU first reminds of its judgment in Kronhofer (C-168/02), where it had ruled out the domicile of the investor as such as the place of financial damage. [read post]
29 Dec 2006, 5:37 pm
The combination of reputation and popularity in selecting news that matters B. [read post]
31 Oct 2006, 7:54 am
"  The First holds that it doesn't really matter, because even though C&M is arguing that an error in the part of the case of which the First lacks jurisdiction, while we will not disturb (for jurisdictional reasons) the district court's judgment holding that the bond was an unconditional guarantee by AIICO, we can review the correctness of that ruling as a defense to C&M's liability under the indemnity agreement if… [read post]