Search for: "People v. Short"
Results 6621 - 6640
of 8,145
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Dec 2013, 12:27 am
Case T‑394/10, Elena Grebenshikova v OHIM, Volvo Trademark Holding AB intervening, is a fascinating decision of the General Court of the European Union (Third Chamber) on 5 December. [read post]
24 Feb 2013, 12:07 pm
The copyright monopoly is longer, but much more limited than the short, 'powerful' patent monopoly. [read post]
18 Apr 2018, 2:42 pm
In short, it is not good news&mdas [read post]
11 Jan 2022, 1:28 am
This writer is woefully behind the times in writing about this decision, but it does merit belated discussion and is a very important decision to keep in mind in relation to intermediaries.The case of Frank Peterson v Google LLC (along with another case; Elsevier v Cyando) concerns Nemo Studio, a company owned by Mr Peterson who is a music producer. [read post]
13 Jul 2021, 4:40 pm
Different people respond to reading, hearing or viewing the same content in different ways. [read post]
22 Aug 2012, 12:54 am
The quotes come directly from the three major fair dealing decisions: CCH Canadian, Access Copyright, and SOCAN v. [read post]
10 Aug 2012, 12:41 pm
E.g., “The fair use doctrine, in short, was both useless to Righthaven’s defendants, and structurally facilitative of Righthaven’s strategy. [read post]
15 Apr 2021, 6:07 am
See, e.g., Lackey v. [read post]
3 Feb 2021, 4:00 am
Pearson, stating that, “Canadians do not need to be liberated,” de Gaulle abruptly cut short his visit and left for France. [read post]
10 Mar 2020, 9:48 am
One concern that has emerged is that the Minister of Justice suggested in comments that it refers to “a death that is expected ‘in the relatively near-term’ or ‘over a relatively short period of time.'” The inclusion of this requirement in the legislation originally was controversial because Carter did not seem to require it (see here, here and here, for example); nevertheless, it was included and doctors have interpreted the term differently as a result… [read post]
13 Sep 2013, 1:18 pm
Groeneveld Transport Efficiency, Inc. v. [read post]
9 May 2011, 4:35 am
Remember Rudovsky v. [read post]
6 Jul 2022, 11:10 am
Immediately, the speculations from the White House to the shores of California began as people wondered who would be the replacement. [read post]
19 Dec 2023, 6:22 pm
"District of Columbia v. [read post]
15 Jul 2019, 9:01 pm
City of Boca Ratonand Burlington Industries v. [read post]
27 Mar 2023, 5:30 am
Plus there was a pandemic, so staffing was short. [read post]
18 Apr 2013, 6:00 am
Some parts of the Bill are organized similar to the Canada Labour Code, from employment standards to health and safety, to unionized workplaces, as follows: PART I: Preliminary Matters PART II: Employment Standards PART III: Occupational Health and Safety PART IV: Appeals and Hearings re: Parts II and III PART V: Radiation Health and Safety PART VI: Labour Relations PART VII: Public Service Essential Services (Place Holder) PART VIII: Labour-Management Actions (Temporary Measures During… [read post]
30 May 2007, 11:50 pm
We the People simply spoke differently in this time period. [read post]
25 May 2011, 12:47 pm
Paul V. [read post]
19 Jul 2009, 2:07 pm
For example, the intention behind the equal protection clause might be formulated at a relatively high level of generality--leading to the conclusion that segregation is unconstitutional--or at a very particular level--in which case the fact that the Reconstruction Congress segregated the District of Columbia schools might be thought to support the "separate but equal" principle of Plessy v. [read post]
