Search for: "Peter v. Peter" Results 6621 - 6640 of 8,633
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Aug 2009, 8:12 am
Department of Health and Human ServicesAtlanta Federal Center, Suite 3B7061 Forsyth Street, S.W.Atlanta, GA 30303-8909Voice Phone (404)562-7886FAX (404)562-7881TDD (404)331-2867Region V - Chicago (Illinois, Indiana, Michigan, Minnesota, Ohio, Wisconsin)Valerie Morgan-Alston, Regional ManagerOffice for Civil RightsU.S. [read post]
19 May 2020, 10:37 am by Miquel Montañá (Clifford Chance)
Moving on to the national plane, the first judgment this author is aware of where a Spanish Court ordered a permanent injunction in a situation where no acts of infringement or even “imminent” infringement had been established is the judgment of 17 May 2006 (Warner-Lambert,  Geodecke and Pfizer v. [read post]
8 Feb 2011, 1:26 pm by Christine Hurt
  Well, according to the facts alleged in the complaint, there's a lot more there to hang one's partnership hat on than in Holmes v. [read post]
10 May 2017, 4:00 am by John Willinsky
In April, Emperor Charles V called upon Luther to appear before the Imperial Diet of Worms where his works and views were publicly denounced. [read post]
30 May 2011, 3:21 am by Adam Wagner
Shoesmith was dismissed by Haringey Council following the fall-out over the Baby Peter case. [read post]
17 Sep 2009, 6:52 pm
In Talacko v Talacko [2009] VSC 349, the Supreme Court of Victoria made Mareva-type orders, restraining the defendants to proceedings pending before the Court from disposing of properties in the Czech Republic, Slovakia and Germany. [read post]
28 Aug 2010, 11:06 am by dnt.atheniense@gmail.com
“Em geral, as novas regras vão balancear os interesses dos funcionários e das empresas”, disse o ministro. [read post]
3 Jan 2008, 3:41 am
Summaries are prepared by Law Librarians and are not official statements of the Wyoming Supreme Court Case Name: Hite v. [read post]