Search for: "Sales v. State"
Results 6621 - 6640
of 21,156
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Aug 2017, 7:02 am
"Realtime Data LLC d/b/a IXO v. [read post]
3 Aug 2017, 6:45 am
ARB and Morning Star Packing Co. v. [read post]
3 Aug 2017, 6:06 am
” [2] See SEC v. [read post]
3 Aug 2017, 5:47 am
The German Supervisory Authority (BaFin) also stated that due to the German law transposing the IDD the following German regulations will need to be amended: the Regulation on Insurance Mediation (Versicherungsvermittlungsverordnung (VersVermV)) (relating e.g. to annual training obligations) and the Regulation on Information Obligations for Insurance Contracts (Verordnung über Informationspflichten bei Versicherungsverträgen (VVG-InfoV)) (e.g. alignment with PRIIPs Regulation, in… [read post]
2 Aug 2017, 12:54 pm
The sheer volume of the sales attracted the attention of the DEA and state law enforcement authorities. [read post]
2 Aug 2017, 12:54 pm
The sheer volume of the sales attracted the attention of the DEA and state law enforcement authorities. [read post]
2 Aug 2017, 12:36 pm
In Barbuto v. [read post]
2 Aug 2017, 7:00 am
And as the Supreme Court held the 1983 case Immigration and Naturalization Service v. [read post]
1 Aug 2017, 5:53 pm
On July 25, 2017, the US Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) issued an investigative report stating that US securities laws apply to sales of securities in the United States purchased with virtual currencies or distributed with blockchain technology. [read post]
1 Aug 2017, 10:17 am
Tam’ case below.http://thettablog.blogspot.com/2017/06/uspto-issues-new-examination-guideline.html * Matal v. [read post]
1 Aug 2017, 5:31 am
Co-author Chance Decker We recently discussed Freeman v. [read post]
1 Aug 2017, 1:05 am
Lord Hughes states that the acid test should be whether the application is in substance (impermissibly) to vary or alter the final order or whether it is (permissibly) to support it by working out how it should be carried into effect [54]. [read post]
31 Jul 2017, 11:58 am
” The court further bolsters its analysis with Supreme Court of Virginia case law (Parish v. [read post]
31 Jul 2017, 11:38 am
Facts: This case (Jesa Enterprises LTD v. [read post]
31 Jul 2017, 7:37 am
’ (United States v. [read post]
31 Jul 2017, 7:00 am
United States, 292 F. [read post]
31 Jul 2017, 3:28 am
” The complaint’s stated purpose for inspection relating to previously dismissed claims for management and acquisition fees “does not constitute a proper purpose. [read post]
31 Jul 2017, 1:00 am
R (HC) v Secretary of State for Works and Pensions & Ors, heard 21-22 Jun 2017. [read post]
30 Jul 2017, 4:49 pm
It cannot then be capitalized to reduce any gain upon the sale of the farm. [read post]
30 Jul 2017, 4:49 pm
It cannot then be capitalized to reduce any gain upon the sale of the farm. [read post]
