Search for: "Strong v. State"
Results 6621 - 6640
of 16,399
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Dec 2016, 9:22 am
This summer, the Ninth Circuit issued its Flores v. [read post]
15 Dec 2016, 6:07 am
According to Lady Hale, failing to exempt A from the “bedroom tax” was discriminatory “in the sense described in Thlimmenos v Greece: treating her like any other single parent with one child when in fact she ought to be treated differently” (at [75]). [read post]
14 Dec 2016, 11:19 am
There were strong pieces of evidence on each side. [read post]
14 Dec 2016, 5:37 am
In Saghir Ahmad v. [read post]
14 Dec 2016, 5:37 am
In Saghir Ahmad v. [read post]
13 Dec 2016, 9:01 pm
Indeed, it has happened before.In the 1992 case of Planned Parenthood v. [read post]
13 Dec 2016, 6:13 am
Tillerson emerged as a contender on the strong recommendations of James A. [read post]
13 Dec 2016, 1:53 am
The Court held that, in principle, the right to respect for private life under Article 8 can extend to the professional lives of the social worker and police officer (R (Wright) v Secretary of State for Health and R (L) v Commissioner of Police for the Metropolis). [read post]
12 Dec 2016, 1:04 pm
Soliciting a specific illegal act may generally be made illegal (see, e.g., U.S. v. [read post]
12 Dec 2016, 8:47 am
Tillerson has close ties with President Vladimir V. [read post]
12 Dec 2016, 6:57 am
As noted by Judge Warner’s strong dissent in the linked-to case above: The right to marry is a fundamental right, protected by the United States Constitution. [read post]
12 Dec 2016, 6:57 am
As noted by Judge Warner’s strong dissent in the linked-to case above: The right to marry is a fundamental right, protected by the United States Constitution. [read post]
12 Dec 2016, 4:14 am
Briefly: In Mayer Brown’s Meaningful Discussions blog, Roger Abbott looks at the court’s opinion last week in State Farm Fire and Casualty Co. v. [read post]
11 Dec 2016, 9:01 pm
In its November 23, 2016 decision in Gardella v. [read post]
10 Dec 2016, 5:02 am
C-160/15, GS Media BV v. [read post]
8 Dec 2016, 12:08 pm
For example in the opinion of Abry Partners V, L.P. v. [read post]
8 Dec 2016, 7:12 am
State, Williams v. [read post]
8 Dec 2016, 7:12 am
State, Williams v. [read post]
8 Dec 2016, 1:30 am
Eadie QC: yes. 15.20 Eadie QC submits that Parliament set up a legislative scheme under the 1972 Act by way that actions by the UK Government and those of other member states flow back to affect member states. [read post]
6 Dec 2016, 7:59 am
From the Jimeno decision:The facts of this case are therefore different from those in State v. [read post]
