Search for: "THE UNITED STATES et al" Results 6621 - 6640 of 8,485
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Mar 2011, 9:57 am
SCOTT KAVALEK, et al., Defendants, Civil Action No. 08-2646-NLH, United States District Court, D. [read post]
1 Jun 2010, 1:51 pm
by Matthew Massari On May 24, 2010, the United States Supreme Court issued a unanimous decision that may ultimately change the way pro sports teams and leagues can license team-owned intellectual property for merchandise and apparel items. [read post]
11 Nov 2022, 7:44 am by INFORRM
Zuckerberg  et al.Decision Date: June 16, 2019 The United States District Court Northern District of California dismissed a First Amendment claim against Facebook. [read post]
29 Oct 2009, 11:11 am
United States Issue: Whether, under 28 U.S.C. [read post]
13 May 2009, 8:00 pm
United States Patent and Trademark Office, et al., was filed in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York against the PTO, Myriad Genetics and the University of Utah Research Foundation, which hold the patents on the BRCA genes. [read post]
10 Apr 2009, 2:55 pm
(Chairman Schaumber and Member Liebman participated.) *** Loparex LLC (18-CA-18436, et al.; 353 NLRB No. 126) Hammond, WI March 31, 2009. [read post]
28 Apr 2022, 5:01 am by Farzaneh Badiei
Then the post discusses the regulation of Apple’s App Store in the United States and China. [read post]
3 Apr 2017, 1:38 pm by Ana Muñoz
Cherri Foytlin et al., the Court made clear that the statute extends to citizens’ right to advocate not just for themselves, but also for others. [read post]
17 Jun 2018, 1:39 pm by Nikki Siesel
The United States Patent & Trademark Office (the “USPTO”) will typically accept this statement without question. [read post]
28 Oct 2011, 2:59 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
McDONOUGH and DRINKER BIDDLE & REATH LLP, Defendants.10 Civ. 6106 (DAB)UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK; 2011 U.S. [read post]
12 Jun 2011, 5:12 pm by pgbarnes
The appeal came in the case of Derek Carder, et al v. [read post]