Search for: "The United States, Petitioner"
Results 6621 - 6640
of 8,963
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Feb 2008, 9:37 am
The Tucker Act by its own terms applies to constitutional claims against the United States. [read post]
6 Aug 2008, 7:07 am
Some tragedies just haunt you forever.Given that the only possible enforcement for Vienna violations would be action by the United Nations Security Council, in which the United States has a veto, it's hard to predict what will happen going forward. [read post]
21 Mar 2018, 3:55 am
” At Fa on First, Wen Fa talks about his experience as counsel for the petitioner in Minnesota Voters Alliance v. [read post]
26 Feb 2018, 7:24 am
The scheme allowed Allergan to still exclusively control use of the underlying inventions and potentially benefit from the Sovereign Immunity given to Indian Nations within the United States. [read post]
12 Feb 2013, 11:05 pm
We demonstrated the intrinsic merit of our client’s research in the United States, the national scope of his research, and asserted that our client would serve the national interest to a substantially greater degree than would an available U.S. worker having the same minimum qualifications. [read post]
12 Mar 2014, 7:25 am
United States, in which the Court held that land exchanged with or transferred to the owners of private property under an 1875 law once again became their property when the railroad that ran across the property has been abandoned. [read post]
7 Oct 2010, 8:15 am
Brief for Petitioners 28. [read post]
26 Mar 2010, 8:08 am
Tomoeh Murakami Tse at the Washington Post reports on efforts to challenge other regulations governing state and federal elections in the aftermath of the Court’s decision in Citizens United. [read post]
26 Aug 2014, 4:23 am
” In The Atlantic, Garrett Epps argues that Justice Antonin Scalia’s 2013 dissent in United States v. [read post]
6 Dec 2013, 3:52 am
” At ACSblog, Erwin Chemerinsky discussed Wednesday’s oral argument in United States v. [read post]
25 Aug 2008, 5:21 pm
State of Indiana (NFP) [read post]
24 Apr 2013, 7:25 am
United States, the Court is considering whether the “recommendation” of a government attorney is intangible property that can be the subject of an extortion attempt under the Hobbs Act. [read post]
22 Jan 2019, 3:50 am
United States, which asks whether the Supreme Court should overrule the “separate sovereigns” exception to the double jeopardy clause, and patent case Helsinn Healthcare v. [read post]
17 Apr 2008, 1:33 pm
Unfortunately for Burgess, however, the reason the Court was able to move with such velocity was that there was little disagreement that the position of the United States was the correct one; indeed, on Wednesday, April 17, in a unanimous opinion by Justice Ginsburg, the Court affirmed the decision of the Fourth Circuit and ruled against Burgess. [read post]
2 Nov 2008, 4:00 am
United States v. [read post]
6 Aug 2009, 6:23 am
Department of Labor that is valid for the entire employment period stated on the petition.The petitioner must also indicate an employment start date before October 1, 2009.Petitions received on or after Oct. 1, 2009, and/or requesting a starting date on or after October 1, 2009, will be considered towards the fiscal year 2010 H-2B cap and are subject to all eligibility requirements for fiscal year 2010 H-2B filings, including 8 CFR 214.2(h)(6)(iv)(D), which requires that the start… [read post]
1 Nov 2010, 6:53 am
The Cleveland Plain Dealer reports on David Mills, the young appellate lawyer who will argue on behalf of the petitioner, an Ohio woman who was sexually assaulted in a state prison. [read post]
2 Oct 2023, 9:05 am
Fikre; Office of the United States Trustee v. [read post]
29 Mar 2010, 4:37 am
Second, the article asserts that the breadth of support for the petitioners in Caperton, combined with state-level developments in the decision? [read post]
24 Oct 2019, 7:00 am
United States 19-361Disclosure: Goldstein & Russell, P.C., whose attorneys contribute to this blog in various capacities, is counsel on a cert-stage amicus brief in support of the petitioners in this case. [read post]
