Search for: "Arizona Supreme Court" Results 6641 - 6660 of 9,060
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 May 2011, 2:34 pm by Scott David Stewart
Arroyo (RI Supreme Court , April 1, 2011) http://caselaw.findlaw.com/ri-supreme-court/1562379.html [read post]
20 May 2011, 6:40 am
And The Associated Press reports that "Ruling restricts warrantless 'protective sweeps.'" You can access yesterday's ruling of the Supreme Court of Arizona at this link. [read post]
19 May 2011, 4:24 pm by Justin Tenuto
In fact, there’s a growing consensus that Arizona SB 1070 will eventually find its way to the Supreme Court, especially as more states enact similar laws. [read post]
19 May 2011, 1:58 pm by Robert Sewell
  The Arizona Supreme Court decided to exclude evidence found in the illegal search, meaning a jury will never hear of the evidence. [read post]
19 May 2011, 1:40 pm by Moria Miller
 And we stage it as an actual Supreme Court case– we use a pending case, and the advocates pretend that they are the advocates before the Supreme Court, and they play those roles. [read post]
19 May 2011, 8:37 am by Gritsforbreakfast
Who knows if the 3rd Court panel will approve the warrant, or for that matter whether the Court of Criminal Appeals will be as firm in upholding the particularity requirement as was the Texas Supreme Court. [read post]
17 May 2011, 4:43 pm by Colin O'Keefe
King, where the United States Supreme Court issued a ruling that will have major implications on searches and seizures. [read post]
17 May 2011, 4:52 am by Paralegal Mentor
The supreme courts or legislatures of all 50 states have established these programs so that the interest on the attorney's trust account is forwarded to the State Bar to provide legal services for low-income citizens. 5. [read post]
16 May 2011, 8:59 am by azatty
In 2010, she produced and directed a documentary series for the Arizona Supreme Court entitled Legends of the Arizona Judiciary. [read post]
15 May 2011, 1:31 pm by Richard Hornsby
Because the defense did not object, the Arizona supreme court found the issue harmless mostly because the jacket was actually introduced for the purpose of identifying the victim, not for its smell. [read post]
12 May 2011, 10:00 am by azatty
Never enjoying the role of potted plant, I had some trepidation in turning over to a newcomer the reins of a roundtable that included a state Supreme Court Justice. [read post]
12 May 2011, 8:00 am by Mandelman
The article that follows below appeared in the San Francisco Chronicle yesterday. [read post]