Search for: "Banks v. State" Results 6641 - 6660 of 15,815
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 Jul 2015, 5:00 am by Kimberly A. Kralowec
Oracle Corp. (2011) 51 Cal.4th 1191, 1206 [under UCL, California employer’s failure to pay overtime wages to out-of-state employees was an unlawful business practice]; Tomlinson v. [read post]
22 Jul 2015, 2:18 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
 Ambiguity between how much of the discourse in A2K is targeted at patent v. copyright. [read post]
22 Jul 2015, 12:35 pm by Adam Levitin
Even longer version:  the plaintiffs in State National Bank of Big Spring v. [read post]
21 Jul 2015, 10:50 am by Larry Tolchinsky
” For instance, in the case of Atlantis Estate Acquisitions, Inc. v. [read post]
20 Jul 2015, 2:54 pm
"  In reaching her decision, the judge cited last year's Supreme Court ruling in Alice Corp v CLS Bank stating that "while the very idea of allowing multiple-device playback may have been novel at the time of invention, the second step of the Alice/Mayo test requires more than a novel ideal - it requires a specific application of that idea, to ensure that all embodiments of the idea (even if novel) are not preempted. [read post]
20 Jul 2015, 2:59 am by Matrix Legal Information Team
Bank of Cyprus UK Ltd v Menelaou, heard 17-18 June 2015. [read post]
20 Jul 2015, 2:43 am
| 3-D Lego trade mark | Garcia v Google | B+ subgroup | EU trade mark reform and counterfeits in transit | French v Battistelli | US v Canada over piracy | UK Supreme Court in Starbucks |  BASCA v The Secretary of State for Business | Patent litigation, music, politics | Product placement in Japan. [read post]
17 Jul 2015, 5:01 am by James Edward Maule
I wonder how many state judges ask parties in divorce cases if they have consulted a tax professional. [read post]
16 Jul 2015, 9:49 am
The Court of Justice of the European Union (Fourth Chamber) gave judgment today in Case C-580/13 Coty Germany GmbH v Stadtsparkasse Magdeburg, an October 2013 reference for a preliminary ruling from the German Bundesgerichtshof. [read post]
Although Iran is recognized as having all the standard NPT rights and obligations of a non-nuclear state, the agreement’s provisions stipulate that the JCPOA’s provision should not be viewed as precedent for interpreting international law, agreements or the NPT. [read post]
15 Jul 2015, 5:30 pm
Although the courts uniformly state that intent controls, where a stock bequest is involved, they differ as to the appropriate principles to apply in ascertaining the testator's intent. [read post]