Search for: "Day v. United States" Results 6641 - 6660 of 25,650
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Feb 2019, 1:16 pm by Berry Law Firm
Some cases may end up in the United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims, which could grant, deny, or remand a case to the Board of Veterans Appeals with specific recommendations to follow. [read post]
26 Feb 2019, 4:03 am by Edith Roberts
First up is United States v. [read post]
25 Feb 2019, 10:28 am by Adam Feldman
The justices, however, are more often a united front then a separated one. [read post]
25 Feb 2019, 8:19 am by Kent Scheidegger
*      *      *That practice effectively allowed a deceased judge to exercise the judicial power of the United States after his death. [read post]
25 Feb 2019, 8:14 am by FHH Law
Per announced FCC policy, the reporting period may end ten days before the report is due, and the reporting period for the next year will begin on the following day. [read post]
25 Feb 2019, 7:33 am by Eugene Volokh
That practice effectively allowed a deceased judge to exercise the judicial power of the United States after his death. [read post]
24 Feb 2019, 1:15 pm by Ilya Somin
Most notably, the Court invalidated the exclusion of women from the Virginia Military Institute in the 1996 case of United States v. [read post]
23 Feb 2019, 12:35 pm by admin
This paper presents a survey of federal and state court decisions on these two questions, hoping to offer some guidance to practitioners. [read post]
22 Feb 2019, 4:32 pm by M@jux-@dmin
EXCEPTION #1: LAW ENFORCEMENT It is legal to wear, carry, or transport a handgun if you are authorized as part of your official equipment, and you are: Law enforcement official of the United States, the State, or a county or city of the State; Member of the armed forces of the United States or of the National Guard on duty or traveling to or from duty; Law enforcement official of another state or subdivision of another state… [read post]
22 Feb 2019, 2:41 pm by Eugene Volokh
Delahanty, 129 F.3d 20, 26 (1st Cir. 1997)(holding courthouses, particularly courtrooms, are nonpublic forums); United States v. [read post]
22 Feb 2019, 2:39 pm by Meredith K. Stewart
United States Department of Homeland Security, had been held in abeyance for close to year because DHS said it would be rescinding the rule, which would make the case moot. [read post]
22 Feb 2019, 6:19 am by MBettman
United States v Salerno, 481 U.S. 739, 755 (1987). [read post]