Search for: "ENGLISH v. STATE"
Results 6641 - 6660
of 7,360
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Sep 2009, 1:27 am
In January of 2000, the Supreme Court of the United States decided the case of Weeks v. [read post]
9 Sep 2009, 7:14 am
You can separately subscribe to the IP Think Tank Global Week in Review at the Subscribe page: [duncanbucknell.com] Highlights this week included: US: CAFC debates whether claim term ‘animal’ includes humans: Martek Biosciences Corp v Nutrinova, Inc (Gray on Claims) (Patently-O) (Patently-O) (IP Watchdog) General USPTO-Pfizer workshop on IP & innovation in Mumbai (Intellectual Property Watch) Australia: Full Federal Court unanimously… [read post]
8 Sep 2009, 6:16 pm
" In that 2006 case, Andersen v. [read post]
8 Sep 2009, 11:30 am
Unni v. [read post]
8 Sep 2009, 3:08 am
A recent decision from the Superior Court of New Jersey, Stengart v. [read post]
7 Sep 2009, 12:53 am
(IP finance) An IP strategist’s economic forecast for 2010: an outsider’s view and how one can outperform the ‘experts’ (IP Asset Maximizer Blog) Australia Advisory Council on Intellectual Property proposes setting up IP dispute resolution centre to deal with patent disputes (Managing Intellectual Property) Brazil IP infringement and capacity to sue in Brazil (IP tango) WTO rules in favour of Brazil, allows for cross retaliation against… [read post]
3 Sep 2009, 9:07 pm
Jane (English Civil War). [read post]
1 Sep 2009, 11:23 am
In a recent decision by the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, Oumar Dieng v. [read post]
29 Aug 2009, 9:31 pm
" Taylor v Farrugia [2009] NSWSC 801 (5 June 2009) Related posts:Ontario: Jurisdiction and Family Law In Okmyansky v. [read post]
29 Aug 2009, 3:00 am
Yet, the applicability of this presumption across courts in the United States is an open question in light of the Supreme Court’s decision in eBay v. [read post]
27 Aug 2009, 6:37 pm
NMCAA's decision in United States v. [read post]
21 Aug 2009, 1:05 pm
" See Christoff v. [read post]
20 Aug 2009, 5:00 am
For example, a 1924 English case (Duff Development v. [read post]
17 Aug 2009, 9:06 am
Cir. 1923; State v. [read post]
16 Aug 2009, 9:51 pm
" An expert for i4i stated that various elements of the WORD products constituted a single data structure because of their physical and logical interrelationships. [read post]
14 Aug 2009, 11:35 am
Earlier this week, while covering the Fordham Law v. [read post]
12 Aug 2009, 2:27 pm
Longhi v. [read post]
12 Aug 2009, 2:52 am
The present case concerned a number of applications to stay the English proceedings by Mr Lewinsohn on the grounds of forum non conveniens, with particular emphasis on the fact that there existed corresponding proceedings on the same issues in Utah.In refusing to stay the English proceedings, Mr Justice Barling held that the ECJ's decision in Owusu v Jackson (C-281/02) (2005) QB 801 ECJ applied even in circumstances where there was a prior action underway in a non-EU… [read post]
10 Aug 2009, 9:16 am
United States v. [read post]
