Search for: "State v. First Judicial District Court"
Results 6641 - 6660
of 9,091
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Dec 2008, 4:49 am
Supreme Court held in 1963's Gideon v. [read post]
1 Jun 2018, 2:06 pm
Wiederhold, District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District Opinion filed May 11, 2018), the Court rejected Domino’s argument. [read post]
14 Oct 2018, 8:09 am
Ameren Illinois Company v. [read post]
24 Feb 2009, 2:34 pm
District Court for the Southern District of New York on November 6, 2007. [read post]
2 Jul 2013, 11:56 am
The trial court cannot make its own motion for monetary sanctions and then award payment to the opposing party, citing Malovec v. [read post]
29 Sep 2023, 1:59 am
Although the District Court in the Kentucky case likewise issued a preliminary injunction against enforcement of the Kentucky law, the District Court issued a stay of its decision and the Panel declined to lift it. [read post]
29 Jan 2011, 4:19 pm
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. [read post]
22 Apr 2011, 8:06 am
State of Montana, hit a pothole when Montana District Court Judge Jeffrey Sherlock ruled against us and in favor of the state's motion to dismiss the case. [read post]
25 Sep 2017, 3:32 pm
WEINSTEIN, PINSON & RILEY, P.S., EVAN MOSCOV, and EGS FINANCIAL CARE, INC., formerly known as NCO FINANCIAL SYSTEMS, INC., Defendants.No. 14 C 739.United States District Court, N.D. [read post]
23 May 2017, 9:30 am
” As the district court noted in United States v. [read post]
14 Nov 2017, 7:48 am
In 1993, in Conroy v. [read post]
3 Feb 2020, 1:37 pm
The first part of the series – looking at IP issues currently pending before the Supreme Court – can be found here. [read post]
21 Dec 2021, 5:00 am
Seized by the DANY via judicial warrant. [read post]
10 Dec 2008, 5:30 am
Holding First, the court held (and the government conceded), that the probation officer needed to obtain a warrant in order to search Kone's home. [read post]
18 Nov 2012, 10:44 pm
Contraceptive Exemption Injunction: The United States District Court for the District of Columbia granted a preliminary injunction against the application of the contraceptives mandate in HHS regulations in Tyndale House Publishers, Inc. v. [read post]
24 Jul 2015, 4:31 pm
See, e.g., United States v. [read post]
13 May 2011, 6:07 pm
Eschewing judicial triumphalism, the court accepted its “limited” role of applying existing state law:[O]ur role in the exercise of our diversity jurisdiction is limited. [read post]
22 Sep 2011, 6:04 pm
And this explains the Court’s intuition that most judicial review should be fact-specific and as-applied.It also explains the Court’s intuition that the First Amendment is an exception to the rule. [read post]
10 Apr 2007, 12:26 pm
Gates and Khadr v. [read post]
10 Sep 2019, 2:11 pm
District Court for the District of Columbia as part of its petition to obtain grand jury material underlying the Mueller report) are more restrictive, but the context for dealing with that material also differs from earlier episodes. [read post]
