Search for: "Compli, Inc."
Results 6661 - 6680
of 11,555
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Dec 2013, 4:48 pm
The owner re-built, but did so without complying with newly applicable building bylaws. [read post]
13 Dec 2013, 3:48 pm
Nonexclusive right to republish granted to Solutions Law Press, Inc. [read post]
13 Dec 2013, 9:24 am
Recent inquiries by the BBB into the behavioral advertising activities of BMW of North America, LLC and Scottrade, Inc. illustrate the requirements of the OBA Principles on Web site publishers. [read post]
13 Dec 2013, 9:24 am
Recent inquiries by the BBB into the behavioral advertising activities of BMW of North America, LLC and Scottrade, Inc. illustrate the requirements of the OBA Principles on Web site publishers. [read post]
13 Dec 2013, 7:46 am
In a recent consent order, the New Jersey Division of Consumer Affairs settled an investigation involving Dokogeo, Inc., a California based mobile application developer. [read post]
12 Dec 2013, 12:57 pm
(Eugene Volokh) Here’s yet another brief that the UCLA First Amendment Amicus Brief Clinic has filed in the last few weeks. [read post]
12 Dec 2013, 8:39 am
Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., 06-1672 (La. [read post]
10 Dec 2013, 7:42 am
Oxford Aviation, Inc., et al., No. 13 C 1697. [read post]
9 Dec 2013, 8:02 am
Apple, Inc., C.A. [read post]
9 Dec 2013, 7:16 am
(formerly Georgia Ventures Inc.) to a potential molybdenum mining deposit in Mexico. [read post]
6 Dec 2013, 10:51 am
Horton, Inc. v. [read post]
6 Dec 2013, 5:38 am
SecurityMetrics, Inc., 2013 WL 6234598, No. [read post]
5 Dec 2013, 7:38 pm
Hobby Lobby Stores, Inc. and Conestoga Wood Specialties v. [read post]
5 Dec 2013, 10:27 am
Case citation: In re Google, Inc. [read post]
4 Dec 2013, 11:40 pm
Google Inc., also known as the Google Book Search Case. [read post]
4 Dec 2013, 3:56 pm
By that, I mean the Hospital cannot claim that the referrals were really warranted regardless of the improper bonus; that the bonus payment was immaterial to whether the referral for services was appropriately made; that services were really provided or needed; or that damages were the difference in value between normal referrals that comply with Stark and referrals allegedly made as a result of Stark violations. [read post]
4 Dec 2013, 2:11 pm
Perhaps nonpacifists had to comply with the draft in any event, because they’d go to prison otherwise — but I don’t see how that makes an Establishment Clause difference, if the essence of the harm is the burden of the exemption on nonbeneficiaries. [read post]
4 Dec 2013, 7:43 am
Dean Witter Reynolds, Inc. (2002) and John Wiley & Sons v. [read post]
4 Dec 2013, 7:01 am
Fiber Optic Designs, Inc., 2-12-cv-04228 (PAED December 2, 2013, Order) (Goldberg, J.) [read post]
4 Dec 2013, 4:14 am
Painting & Decorating Inc., a Ronkonkoma painting and stucco contractor with a long history of fall protection and scaffold safety violations, now faces an additional $460,350 in fines from the U.S. [read post]
