Search for: "Cost v. Cost" Results 6661 - 6680 of 48,975
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Jun 2021, 12:22 am by JR Chaves
Ahora bien, aquí está el dato interesante que nos acaba de refrescar y matizar la jurisprudencia casacional forjada en la STS de 20 de mayo de 2021 (rec.6212/2019), relativo a la falta de la memoria (informe técnico-económico del art.25 Ley Haciendas Locales sobre costes de servicios) que debe acompañar a toda ordenanza municipal y que constituye un vicio sustancial y como tal, podrá aludirse tanto en la impugnación directa como en la… [read post]
6 Jun 2021, 4:17 pm by INFORRM
  Mr Porter discontinued his claim and recovered no damages but the parties agreed no order as to costs. [read post]
6 Jun 2021, 12:59 pm by David Cole
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit (Koala v. [read post]
6 Jun 2021, 11:21 am by Giles Peaker
Either a direction that Mr Gell file and serve a proper defence addressing just the amount of recoverable service charges (as per Brown v. [read post]
4 Jun 2021, 2:15 pm by Lydia Estep
This rule is further explained in the Court’s decision in Blue & Gold Fleet, L.P. v. [read post]
4 Jun 2021, 12:22 pm by Christiana Wayne
Christiana Wayne shared the Supreme Court’s ruling in Van Buren v. [read post]
3 Jun 2021, 9:03 pm by Jillian Moss
Based on an exception articulated in Montana v. [read post]
3 Jun 2021, 10:39 am
  Anyone wishing to provide input on the potential appointees’ qualifications is welcome to fill out the evaluation forms linked below, or to contact committee chair Alana Rotter at arotter@gmsr.com. https://www.surveymonkey.com/r/RexHeinke https://www.surveymonkey.com/r/HonHollyThomas https://www.surveymonkey.com/r/HonGregoryWeingart Also note, today's DJ has FRAPs do not allow district court to alter allocation of costs, by Hoge Fenton's Dennis Zell, about… [read post]
2 Jun 2021, 1:08 pm by Giles Peaker
Appeal allowed on the costs point and case remitted to the Magistrates for costs consideration. [read post]
2 Jun 2021, 8:15 am by Christopher G. Hill
  In Dickson v Forney Enterprises, Inc. et. al., the Court looked at the question of whether costs of a project manager’s purely clerical duties can be included and correspondingly whether performing those duties can extend the relevant one-year limitations period for filing suit. [read post]
2 Jun 2021, 8:15 am by Christopher G. Hill
  In Dickson v Forney Enterprises, Inc. et. al., the Court looked at the question of whether costs of a project manager’s purely clerical duties can be included and correspondingly whether performing those duties can extend the relevant one-year limitations period for filing suit. [read post]